So, what exactly is the correct, most fitting ideology that human

>>3200351
Anarcho-Syndicalist commune

Catholic Monarchist Theocracy.

File: IMG_1296.jpg (39KB, 600x379px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 600x379px

>>3200351
>anarcho-anything
No, just no.

>>3200362
>Catholic Monarchist Theocracy
This, pre-schism

Sanatana Dharma is an objectively correct answer.

File: 1486062024423.png (206KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 800x800px

Global socialist/distributivist Thearchic Catholic Monarchy (led by Habsburgs)

>>3200370
>Socialist
Nahh senpai
>Minimalist
There we go

Meta-ideology aka post modernism

I remember hearing Aasimov's "The Last Question" and picking up the whole "merging minds" thing, yeah that would be probably the best thing you could do on a global level.
Or you know, just ask Multivac.

File: fight-club-brad-pitt-tyler-durden.jpg (88KB, 650x414px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 650x414px

Anarcho-primitivism

>>3200351
Honestly National socialism. Germany was at its best pre WWII

Classical liberalism with human face.

>>3200388
As utterly retarded as anarcho-primitivism is I agree with this

>>3200388

>>3200351
anarchy anything if ur a bull

File: 1479927006637.png (2KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 225x225px

>>3200388
>>3200414
>>3200416
>hehe popculture tells me that the best world order is primitivistic (but only in theory because then the filmmakers couldn't get paid by me) so I'm going to listen to it

>>3200351

it would be one that pressuposes there is no real solution to 'the problem', since the problem is life as such, there will never be a end or a 'new beggining' or some end-all revolutionary eschaton, things will never get better, all individual life will end, no living thing can escape the process, and the only thing to do is bow down to abject absurdity in full and complete acceptance of what is as is, to consciously recognise and accept the order of things and organise into a life of discipline, toil and systemic sacrifice, thus and only thus achieving true freedom

in fact such a ideology should be actively opposed to all 'solutions' since there is a real danger with developments in technology and science that a 'solution' could actualy be found that would solve 'the problem' - not that this would mean it would have to be neo-ludite or primitivist, on the contrary, technology is part of the inescapable process and of the continuoulsy emerging order of things, but all naive ideas about 'finaly solving xy trough the use of science and magnets' should be not only abandoned but actively discouraged, regardless of weather the 'problem' in question is world hunger or world peace or equality or immortality or whatever, instead a understanding and appreciation of chaos should be cultivated and deepened trough life, untill it is understood there are no glitches in reality, including human beings, every thing is a feature

this would be the base to the approach to the use and development of technology and the organisation of life and work, not towards end-all solutions or trough any notion of progress, but trough a notion of endless inescapable process, repetitive, mechanical, even cyclical, inevitably unplesant and finaly deadly without exeption, but a process made conscious

...but realy that would be a religion rather than a ideology

File: C_9GntKUIAAB4A3.jpg (115KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1200x675px

>>3200357
Syndicalist scum