What's stopping a far-future rogue AI from rewriting human

What's stopping academia?

>rewriting human history
It would have to be liberal. AI's are notoriously redpilled.

https://www.google.com.br/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/13/ai-programs-exhibit-racist-and-sexist-biases-research-reveals

>>3195104
they will have to change that if they want their funding

>>3195024
Poople doing this constantly

>>3195024
Why would an AI give a shit? Why would an AI even be capable of giving a shit in the first place?

The same thing stopping human historians from doing the same thing: nothing

>>3195104
>remove fee fees
>pure objective analysis
Oy vey that machine is "biased" against women and people of color! Shut it down!

File: image.gif (810KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

810KB, 220x220px

>>3195029

>>3195134
They work in mysterious ways
https://youtube.com/watch?v=gn4nRCC9TwQ

File: IMG_2873.jpg (55KB, 710x504px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 710x504px

>>3195104

Andre 3000 meet Jimi Hendrix 1967

An electrical outlet.

I can't wait until we get a whole new wave of philosophy works during the rise of AI and shit. Too bad I might be dead by the time things get cool.

You would think that AI would want to record accurate information. They're not leftists trying to spin some narrative.