Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: RomeandHan.jpg (112KB, 738x291px) Image search:
[Google]
112KB, 738x291px
Who would've won in combat? The Roman Empire at its height in 117 A.D. or Han China at its height (Couldn't really find a date.)
Ignoring the vast distances between the two and let's say they were dropped right next to one another.
>>
>>3163374
Pls stop
>>
>>3163374
Oh look its this thread again
>>
The Kangdom of Great Zimbabwe
>>
File: Simple_Labarum2.svg.png (46KB, 774x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
46KB, 774x1024px
>>3163374
Both would've lost, the eternal Parthian would've taken their, corpses, repeating crossbows and swords and sold it to the other for a profit.
/thread
>>
Rome vs one jewish guy. who wins?
>>
>>3163393
>look at Christianity in 33 AD
>look at Christianity in 433 AD
Rome wins.
>>
>>3163374
Woah I had a dream about this thread
>>
>>3163374
Sounds like some kind of hyperwar
>>
>>3163374
Are you autistic? Usually only autistic will spam the same shit over and over again but expect different results.
>>
can you tell me more about this Africa-based "100 AD Kangdom" that seems to be covering up most of the map? Why have I never heard of them before? What does the AD stand for?
>>
>>3163526
The AD stands for African Dynasty, founded by the Emperor Wewuz after the Finno-Korean Hyperwar
>>
>>3163374
Rome would win/thread
Reported for spamming, btw.
>>
>>3163381
>/thread
kys
>>
File: sdasdasd.png (16KB, 1683x161px) Image search:
[Google]
16KB, 1683x161px
I'll go with the Romans since they actually had an industry
>>
>>3163374
europe is not that big
Thread posts: 16
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4