You have 10 seconds to prove that modal realism is false.

well the guy who came up with the theory is american so it's pretty much worthless

>>3162840
it describes a truth that is relative, so it's imperfect

the highest truth is absolute just like the highest world is absolute

>>3162866
No, it describes a metaphysical account of reality that is indexical.

>>3162840
Well, the fact that you even posed this as a challenge implies that there is a possibility of success and failure, that if I had presented compelling evidence, I'd have disproved it, and if I had done it fast enough, it would have been in under ten seconds. But since such a counterfactual refers not to anything in the universe, it must refer to something outside the universe so, somewhere outside this universe I presented a compelling proof in under ten seconds.

>>3162866
sorry but that's just a relative opinion of what the highest truth is 8)

*stares incredulously*

>look i can play around with semantics and words
>look how intelligent i am

Actually come up with a logical argument to support it