So China is known for not valuing human life as much as western

>>3154122
Nah, they'd just flood rivers and kill twice as many people than the Nanking Massacre they like to bitch about all the time

File: 2004-4-13-ny-parade-01.jpg (70KB, 667x500px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 667x500px

>>3154122
No, they probably would have used trenches or fought like Kai-Shek and the Nationalists did against the Japanese in 1931.

>>3154122
No.

Its a meme that China values no life. The only reason the casulties are so huge is because China is HUGE. Not just HUGE, XBOX HEUG. Imagine if all of Europe united. China would still have roughly large population and economy for most of its history.

Europe has been divided because european kingdoms couldn't get along with one another and were always vying for small powers. This is why even the "great" european wars are so tiny compared to China.

>>3154172
>The reasons the casualties are huge is because China is huge
No, it's because more of them died

>>3154183
Peasants starving to death is pretty common in all parts of the world though, why is China so special?

>>3154193
Probably the part about causing it by being super autistic and killing sparrows? I mean Stalin gets plenty of shit about the whole Ukrainian thing, but Mao really took it to another level

>>3154193
Because outside of the Holdomodor there weren't mass starvations in Europe.

>>3154183
>I purposely misconstrue someone's argument so I have something to say
>casualties means they died!

Can't make this shit up

>>3154200
>holdomodor
Lol what?

>>3154193
Proper records keeping.

Huge urban centers for civilian gatherings.