Why are Americans so damn good at conventional warfare?
The only country that's ever been able to beat us was a literal superpower, when we weren't even a regional power.
>inb4 muh Vietnam
Insurgencies are not conventional
>>3153142
>Spain
>super power
Spain was bankrupt and crumbling empire
Cuba was on the other side of the world to Spain
>>3153150
I said the only country able to beat us. I was talking about the British. To be fair they never actually beat us. But they managed to take us to a stalemate.
>>3153142
>War 1812
Bruh literally Canada beat you and burned down your white house lmao
Love my country xP
>>3153142
>Why are Americans so damn good at conventional warfare?
access to a continent's worth of resources and a heartland that is protected by the ultimate wall
>>3153142
>Posting the spanish american war as an example of military prowess
Wew lad. This reaches anglo levels of boasting about shit
Anglos are good at war, and Anglo Americans were dominant in the country until well into the 20th century.
>>3153142
We conquered the last colonies of a dying empire that has become a meme country since.
>>3153142
> Why are Americans so damn good at conventional warfare?
Because they're never under a direct thread, can have all the time they need and pick their fights. Murricans still can't get over ACW, something the rest of the world experience every 50 or so years. They would have collapsed in a month if they had directly experienced something like Marne, Fall Gelb, Barbarossa or Bagration.
That war was basically just kicking Spain while it was down.
>>3153355
It was already dead since the frogs got the throne