https://www.battleforthenet.com/july12/#participants
4chan is not listed here.
Food for philosophical thought here; should it be?
Discuss.
>>3149255
If this is for something that happened on July 12, then 4chan already missed it.
>>3149269
>https://www.battleforthenet.com/july12/#participants
kek, good point... but that doesn't really matter I guess.. the question still stands... Should 4chan have been listed in such a group?
>>3149354
I'm not saying you should.
I'm just asking what you think and why you think it.
>>3149354
The noseless look doesn't suit anybody, anon.