>citizens have to pay a fixed sum of money per office/position they vote for
>they receive a 1.5x payout if the candidate they voted for wins
I'd like to immediately state that I am aware this is an awful idea.
However, I'm curious, as a sort of thought experiment, of HOW this would impact a society if implemented, what societal changes would be seen in both the long-term and short-term?
>>3135470
>voting for the assumed winner for a payout
your not really voting for the best candidate or his platform in this case OP
everyone would vote for the most popular candidate
>>3135470
I kinda wanted this system for war.
Vote for the war? At least one offspring and war taxes please,
If we win you get part of the spoils. If we lose then fuck you anyways you warmonger.
>>3135470
We already had a system like this in America back in the nineteenth century, in the form of poll taxes and party patronage. Look up Tammany Hall. The system was a failure and corruption was prolific.
>>3135470
>my feet hurt
>I'm hungry
>Glorious dear leader is too loud
>What is this thing excreting even
>I'm still hungry
>I wish I was at home dying of starvation
>Could I eat that
>I'm hungry