Would Latin America be a better place today if Iberian colonists don't mix up with the natives?
>thiny veiled pol thread
sage
It would have been better if they all turned into snakes.
It would be better off if Euros never colonized it.
There were simply too many of them so it wouldn't have made a difference.
>population stagnates
>colonies eventually die out due famine and disease
>Spanish gold and silver doesn't get dumped en masse into European economy, Europe remains poor as trade stagnates
>British NA colonies don't profit from Caribbean and inter-oceanic trade, don't get as rich and remain as a backwater British colony. The US never comes to be.
>European powers remain in their petty internal squabbles getting progressively poorer and lag behind Ottoman and Chinese tech.
>spark of the Industrial revolution starts somewhere in Central Asia, boosted by Ottoman-Chinese trade
>Ottomans invent smokeless powder, and repeating weapons somewhere in the 18th century, mass produce them and rape Europe
>Ottomans now dominate the entire western half of the Eurasian continent, them and China begin a colonial race to conquer the Americas and Africa
>>3127344
>central asia
>doing anything ever
I'm central asian desu
>>3127372
I've been a bit of a central asian fan lately, I've been reading Otoyomegatari
>>3127201
Incas were superior to europeans, my eurangutan mutt. Deal with it.
>>3127344
This is history and humanities. Not fiction and fantasies. Retard
>>3127447
And after reading it you really expect anything from them? Those tribalist fucks?