Why didn't Slavs expand into Scandinavia? Did they

>>3123712

Its disrectful to poles not including poland in hometown

>>3123712
Some did, but Scandinavia has shitty soil, not even Germanics wanted to live there and used to run away en masse to Central Europe.

Slavs are master farmers though, so they liked plains more.

t. knower

Slav = slave

>>3123712
where did they get these borders of kiev culture from?

>>3123712
Well they expanded into Russia and that place was just Greater Scandinavia until the Slavs came along and intermingled with the locals.

>>3123953
> american "education"

>>3124215
The word slave does originate from slav though.

>>3124241
>american education

>>3124246
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/slave#Etymology

>>3124241
It isn't. They have the same root, actually.

File: slave meme.png (34KB, 1904x861px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 1904x861px

>>3124249
No, they don't.

>>3124285
Now that's a meme.

Can you cite a single source for this?

Or even explain how you can get sclavus from inclavare?

>>3124314
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavs_(ethnonym)

>Commonly thought to derive from Proto-Slavic *slovo (“word”), thus meaning "those who speak meaningfully" and contrasting with *němьcь (“foreigner”, literally “dumb/mute person”). However, that word is an s-stem and thus the inflectional stem of that word is *sloves-, so it cannot be the direct origin as it would lead to an expected form *slovesěni (compare Russian cлoвécнocть (slovésnostʹ)). Thus the most likely origin is the verb *sluti (“to be known”).[1] Both words ultimately derive from Proto-Indo-European *ḱlew- (“fame”).
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Slav
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_language

Just because East Slavs were sold as Slaves by Muslim people doesn't mean Slavs come from Slave. In fact, Slavs started calling themselves "Slav" where they defeated Germanics, Huns and other various tribes of people. Hence names like "Slavomir" meaning Famous in the World.

Slav - famous/glorious
mir - world

>>3124345
Right, but the etymology of Slav isn't being contested here, and even the page you linked to says that the word slave derives from it.

>>3124345
>where they defeated Germanics, Huns and other various tribes of people

WRONG

>>3124364
How so? When Slavs flooded Europe with mass of their people nothing stood in their way up until Franks decided to raid Samo's Empire and that opened up the gate for Nomadic Magyars.

Germanics like Goths and Vandals were denominated to serfs for West Slavs. "Gocie" "Goci" meant "serf" in Proto West-Slavic, especially Polish.
>>3124361
Ah, right. Probably due to Byzantines not being so fond of South Slavs.

File: Goths were Slavic serfs.png (592KB, 1252x628px) Image search: [Google]

592KB, 1252x628px

>>3124393
>denominated
Meant "marginalized" but whatever.

But they were white warriors

>>3124361
>The English term slave derives from the ethnonym Slav. In medieval wars many Slavs were captured and enslaved, which led to the word "slav" becoming synonym to "enslaved person".[13][14][15][16]
>sources are online dictionaries without sources
>reasoning behind therm is that
>in medieval times slavs get btfo
>literally gives 1250-1300 date
So, befoe that they didn't have words for slaves? Or maybe they used latin words
>>3124285
Hm, I wonder.
Also, in which wars slavs were so hard defeated in those years? I all know, that Germans got heavy BTFO by them.

>>3124416
>in which wars slavs were so hard defeated in those years?
The whole "slav=slave" comes from Nomadic Khazars and Vikins enslaving Eastern Slavs and selling them to other folk, even in Persia.

Also, from Greek hatred towards: Croats, Serbs, Bulgarians etc.

It's funny how niggers and Slavs display the exact same behaviour

>>3124416
>Also, in which wars slavs were so hard defeated in those years?
For example
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kleidion

File: 1496518432976.jpg (257KB, 634x1043px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 634x1043px

It's funny how niggers and Germanics display the exact same behaviour

It's funny how niggers and monkeys display the exact same behaviour

>>3124441
Niggers didn't conquer and dominate the whole world, Pavel. And now back to work, slav(e).

>>3124453
No, you go back to work, autistic serf >>3124408

>Niggers didn't conquer and dominate the whole world, Pavel.
Neither did the Germanics.

>>3124453
Brits are more Celtic than Germanic, though.

File: slavshits inventions.jpg (109KB, 800x637px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 800x637px

>be Germanic Nordic masterrace
>invent the cheese-slicer

>be Slavic Subhuman Slave
>contribute vastly to overall science and progress

really fires my neurons

>>3124456
>No, you go back to work, autistic serf >>3124408

WE-tier, literally.

>>3124457
Sure, this is why they either language is almost entirely composed out of either Germanic or Greek/Latin terms.

On the topic of slaves

The Finnish word for slave, orja comes from Iranian Arya

>>3124469
>WE-tier, literally.
Look at your previous post again and then cry about "WE-tier".

English is a Germanic language with French vocabulary, but you probably didn't know that.

>>3124469
>Sure, this is why they either language is almost entirely composed out of either Germanic or Greek/Latin terms.

Correct, language determines your genes.

>>3124481
You're right. It were Germanics that conquered Europe, and Germanic-Celtic mongrels that rule the world.

>>3124525
>It were Germanics that conquered Europe
Now you gonna claim that the French or Romans were Germanic?

Get a life, burger.

>>3124525
Germanics themselves are mongrels. On top of that, they're mongoloids with african admixture.

Germanics being some kind of masterrace is an outdated sick and laughable meme in the light of modern science and genetic research.

>>3124539
The Franks (Latin: Franci or gens Francorum) were a collection of Germanic peoples that originated in the lands between the Lower and Middle Rhine in the 3rd century AD and eventually formed a large empire dominating much of western and central Europe during the Middle Ages. The Frankish Empire ultimately led to the birth of modern France and Germany and thus the Franks are seen as the forebears of the French and German peoples (in addition to Austrians and some other European nations)

File: Pannonian Franks.png (421KB, 1902x848px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1902x848px

>>3124562
Franks originated in Pannonia(most likely Hallstatt culture) and are genetic ancestors of modern-day French people.

Them being pure germanic variurs of Thyr 14/88 heil is outdated.

>>3124584

According to Y-chromosome studies the African contribution to the French gene pool is massive.
We can forget about Pannonian Franks, they are long gone by now.

File: admixture.png (282KB, 1752x1892px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1752x1892px

>>3124596
>African contribution to the French gene pool is massive.
Except it's not.

Germans are more African than French. Which is ironic.

File: Mongloid Scandinavians.png (90KB, 1839x519px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1839x519px

Teutonboos should just accept how much of a mongrel Germanics truly are.

>>3124547
I never really understood it, reading German history makes it seem like a bunch of autists trying to become a great civilization like Rome and failing most of the time. I don't hate the Germans but all this cocksucking for them is pathetic, its almost worse than BBC cuckposting.

ITT: Slavs and that one French dude against the academia of the world

I especially like how Russia was founded by Swedes.

>>3124630
>against the academia of the world
Except it was academic sources that proved >>3124584
>>3124602
>>3124614

Stay mad Teutoneger.

>>3124641
That's not academia, that's random pseudo-science.

It was actually Jacques the wizard that created the Germanic peoples.

>>3124646
Did the facts hurt your feelings, little shit?

Those are literal sources, not some /pol/tier images:
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2014/10/ancient-genomes-from-great-hungarian.html
http://bga101.blogspot.com/2013/10/eurogenes-k15-now-at-gedmatch.html
http://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/25163-Y-DNA-haplogroups-of-ancient-civilizations/page3?styleid=41

You fucking germanicshits are as dumb as a stick with shit on it.

>>3124677
4chan is missing on that list, so I'm not giving it any credit.

(also you should probably seek help)

>>3124677
>eurogenes
>blogspot
lel

>>3124584

R1b is the most common Y-DNA haplogroup in France, as well as the rest of Western Europe. Your "Frankish" individual from Pannonia had haplotype J2, a Near Eastern haplotype that barely shows up north of Italy or the Balkans.

So I guess your Franks got cucked by their Romano-Celtic peasants, just like the rest of the Germanic migrants coming in from the east.

File: 1500579590694.jpg (56KB, 593x559px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 593x559px

>>3124701
>>3124708
>>3124714
>provide respected sources among people that actually know their shit
>N-NEEEEEIN IT CAN'T BE XD
Last (you) from me for today.

>>3124714

Just FYI and ignoring the French autist

R1b-M269 is thought to have migrated west either through Pannonia/Hungary or north of Slovakia about 2700-2500 BC.
This J2 guy who lived centuries later was similar to French people only in having similar ratio of Indo-European and pre-Indo-European genetic components.

File: Y-DNA Europe.png (865KB, 1960x1793px) Image search: [Google]

865KB, 1960x1793px

>>3124716

Stay mad, surrender monkey.

>>3124630
I didn't know, that Ivan the Terrible was Swede.

>>3124782
why are you calling him German?