New show coming soon. Is it going to be like the Vikings?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0geQYc_Y3E
>>3113859
Lets' hope it's not chocked full of leftist revisionism.
>those greathelms
Why make an accurate one for the logo and then have the actual props be totally wrong
>>3113859
Bah. Its mostly about the Templars.
What I really want is a Crusader show about the sack of Jerusalem where they spend 3 entire episodes of nothing but showing crusaders hacking Muslims to bits and stacking their bodies into mounds the size of houses like how the Christian scribe reported.
And make it bloody like The Walking Dead.
Then air it on Middle Eastern TV.
>>3113919
And lots of this...
>>3113922
"Lmao, what are you going to do, stab me?" - baby
>>3113922
have you ever seen a baby that looked like that?
>>3113888
you know it will be
>>3113919
100% Factual not dramatized at all
>le western europe
>>3113983
>Islam was the religion of peace
>Those dirty Christians were rampaging murderers.
>>3113859
>They speak English
Dropped
>>3113976
Yeah anon, they look like that just look at this 16 year old migrant.
>>3113922
I fucking love the casual brutal violence in medieval art. Everyone always looks bored, the people dying are like "ah this sucks w/e lmao". It has a certain childish charm to it, I can't believe adult men drew shitty drawings like that and got paid for it
>>3113888
It's not revisionism if it's fact.
>>3114035
>Many Muslims sought shelter in the Al-Aqsa Mosque, the Dome of the Rock, and the Temple Mount area generally. According to the Gesta Francorum, speaking only of the Temple Mount area, "...[our men] were killing and slaying even to the Temple of Solomon, where the slaughter was so great that our men waded in blood up to their ankles..." According to Raymond of Aguilers, also writing solely of the Temple Mount area, " in the Temple and porch of Solomon men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins." Writing about the Temple Mount area alone Fulcher of Chartres, who was not an eyewitness to the Jerusalem siege because he had stayed with Baldwin in Edessa at the time, says: "In this temple 10,000 were killed. Indeed, if you had been there you would have seen our feet coloured to our ankles with the blood of the slain. But what more shall I relate? None of them were left alive; neither women nor children were spared."
To be fair, the Crusaders were still in the right.
>>3114282
Not as bad as the Muslims. The crusades vs the Islamic wars of conquest are not even comparable.
>>3114293
Most things the left push aren't factual.
>>3114294
>Not just the men, but the women and children too.
>>3114300
Such as?
>>3114035
This will barely have muslims in it you autist
>>3113994
>Implying there is something wrong with dramatizing the deaths of Muslims
>>3114324
What if they are christian muslims?
>>3114290
Keep in mind 90% of medieval art comes from book illustrations that are only a few inches across at best, and we're looking at highly zoomed in, cropped versions. The facial expressions on most are barely visible in person.
>>3114328
Then we burn them for heresy.
Honestly, we should bring that shit back. All this right wing revisionism about making Christianity the religion of peace makes me ill. Isis is the true form of Islam and they had it when left wingers say Islam is a religion of peace.
We need to get back to our roots. Burn heretics and go on crusades.
>Istanbul will never ever be under Christian hands again.
Feels good man.
>>3114341
You christian LARPers are hilarious
>>3114354
I am looking for an image that says "Francis is not my Pope." with that dog character. The blood of sinners is not free.
>>3113859
looks like very extra has chain and a helmet.
I guess the history channel is willing to spend more money on this show than HBO is willing to spend on game of thrones.
>>3114282
the first crusade was when they invaded and conquered mostly christian lands in anatolia and syria why would the murder the populace? mudslimes destroyed jerusalem, antioch, and eddessa and slaughtered their populations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Edessa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_(1244)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Antioch_(1268)
>>3113919
>>3114341
"burning heretics" is a meme, it barely happened. What did happen is Christians being executed and general cucks. It's one of the most cuckish religions ever, completely negates one's life in favour of passive immaterial fantasy.If you were a truly Christian man, you'd never hurt anyone much less burn "heretics" (you'd convert them, with deceit) and wouldn't go on crusades. The crusades were for reasons beyond religious.
>>3113919
It wouldn't change anything, the fucking hajis were calling us Crusaders during OIF anyways, they're still salty about after almost a thousand years
>>3114389
>that dog character
jesus christ
newfags not even once
>>3113859
>1:17
>>3116482
what, you dident realise that it would be strong independet womyns in it
>>3117476
>implying some peasant women didn't fight when their village was attacked
>>3117509
>implying im implying
>>3116379
From?
>>3113859
>more crusader shit
for fucks sake
when the fuck are they going to make something about the Byzantine Empire
>>3117562
>It's shitty desu.
did you watch the directiors cut? It's miles better that the og cut
>>3117556
Byzantine
>Byzantine
>BYZANTINE
Call it by its proper name, savage.
Basileia tôn Rhōmaiōn
>>3117556
Snuff films are illegal anon
>shows crusades
>jumps to medieval france
>fuck all of that boring history shit, HOLY GRAIL
What the fuck is wrong with the history channel
>>3117605
It's still better quality history than some of the shit they show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtxkpOokScA
>>3113913
this
>>3113888
I think the typical Anglo-American revisionism consisting in removing the French from history in the moment they mattered and focusing on Brits instead despite the fact they were less relevant, is the kind of revisionism we should fear in a show about Templars
We already experienced this kind of revisionism many times in mass media recently (BF1, Wonder Woman, Dunkirk...etc)
calling it now, as soon as this show becomes popular the majority of this site's population will "suddenly" decide that the crusades were never that great anyways and will switch to cossackposting instead.
>>3117663
I would actually like that, tankie.
>>3113859
>still no mainstream exposure for based hospitallers
sad!
>>3113888
Minimum of one black knight called
>>3117677
They're the only order still around, they can deal with it
>no show on northern crusades
>>3114293
Fact of what? Leftist revisionism? WE WUZ KANGS N SHIEET?
>>3117677
t. the guy from Malta
>>3117663
>the majority of this site's population will "suddenly" decide that the crusades were never that great anyways
Well, /his/ pretty much thinks that the crusades were a fuckup and that the crusaders were overglorified unwashed thugs already.