>opposed by most men >opposed by most women >still got

rider of the prohibition movement

>>3113404
It is a (((mystery)))...

>>3113404
>opposed by most women

[citation needed]

>>3113404
>most men and women oppose women having the right to vote
[citation needed]

>>3113440
jews be keepin da white man down

>>3113404
>most men and women oppose women having the right to vote but it still got rammed through by 19th century SJW's

[citation needed]

>opposed by most men
>opposed by most women
>still got rammed through by 19th century SJW's

[citation needed]

>>3113404
>>3113404

What kind of baffles me is that the Roman republic never had women's suffrage throughout its entire history. How did they thwart feminism so efficiently?

>>3113404
((no fucking idea))

>>3113404
>19th century SJW's

I guess we have reached the point where 'SJW' has no meaning anymore.

>>3114690
Why is that surprising? There were plenty of men in Roman territory that never had suffrage.

>>3114690
feminism on this scale that we know today is a modern phenomenon

>>3114690
Did they even have universal suffrage for all males? It only became such a big deal in the US was because the US was kind of unique in having such an emphasis on every man voting, rather than limiting it to members of some kind of "ruling class". Once that was established, people started to consider it unfair that all men could vote, but no women could.

>>3114769
That point was reached long ago.