You're in court for a theft you didn't commit. Pick

>>3100117
Jesus=Judge
Buddha=Defender
Mohammed=Prosecutor

>>3100117
Voltaire: Defence
Socrates: Prosecution
Jesus: Judge

Basically Socrates will piss everyone off, including the entire Jury. Flawless. I just want Voltaire to defend me so I can trade >H >R >E memes with him in the down time.

>>3100203
This. But probably Machiavelli to prosecute. Would be fun I guess

Judge : William lane Craig
Defense : Jesus
Prosecutor : Socrates

Socrates wouldn't make a coherent argument

WLC would do what Jesus says, which means...
>>3100231
/thread

>>3100231
>William lane Craig
literally who?

>>3100117
Judge: Jesus
Defence: Machiavelli
Prosecution: free space

Cant be prosecuted if there's no prosecutor

Machiavelli then congratulates me for this devilish thinking and we go throw up over disgusting old prostitutes

judge: Jesus
:prosecutor: socrates
defender: Machiavelli
The patrician choice.

>>3100117
All-knowing Jesus for judge, problem solved. How is this even a dilemma?

File: greatpyramidcoord.png (460KB, 513x684px)

460KB, 513x684px

>>3100238
>WLC would do what Jesus says

No he wouldn't...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWfTv-fmhhs

>>3100117
Jesus for judge, plead guilty and ask for forgiveness, walk away free.

Judge: Jesus
Defender: Socrates
Prosecutor: Muhammad (PBUH)