Which country's warring states period do you personally find more interesting, China's or Japan's?
>liking eastern history
pleb
>>3099819
>Which country's warring states period do you personally find more interesting, China's or Japan's?
> Appropriating the name of a foreign earlier civil war
Definitely China. Our main character is an edgy Legalist madman who wants to become immortal.
Nobunaga was just a screaming brute whose westabooism amounted to nothing.
Talking about name appropriation, I wonder what an "American Warring States" periods would look like in the aftermath of a hypothetical balkanisation.
>>3099819
Super cute show.
Kinda pretty boring actually. I mean its bluntly just some petty dukes fighting each other.
As for china the first emperor is a cool story but things like Dynasty warriors have fucked it. Things like Lu Bu. Turns out he was just some bandit basically
>>3099819
China's.
Considering Japan's warring warlords literally took the name "Sengoku" from the Chink Warring States.
In addition the Warring States laid the foundation of all of East Asian culture considering that was the time when Confucius and Co. lived.
3 kingdoms > warring states > sengoku
How is this even a close contest? China's warring states actually had a clear ending with various kingdoms getting straight-up conquered whereas Japan's equivalent is a huge anticlimax with a bunch of clans just deciding to recognize Hideyoshi/Tokugawa as top-dog and still largely continuing on with a decentralized system.
In terms of the scale of wars and battles, China has a clear edge even if the records do exaggerate the numbers.
The more casualty, the more interesting.
China definitely
Japan for interesting characters.
China for interesting politics/war.
China's because CHRUAAZY POLEARMS
>>3099836
>Lu Bu
>Warring States period
>Dynasty Warriors
>about the first emperor