What do we even need political philosophers for? He's

>>3098250
>all policy should be based on the weight of evidence

Surely he understands that the first two acts of such an act would be to heavily tax the obese and dramatically increase police discrimination against black men.

>>3098472
*first two acts under such a Constitution

Actually there can be no policy under a purely rational constitution, because rationality can only explain cause and effect, it cannot determine if a given consequence is good or bad.

Gas all STEMniggers

Is it worth arguing over what is no more then an offhand thought, albeit a fairly public one?
The fruit hangs too low here.

>>3098250
The basis of goals is generally speaking not rational or logical. A certain action or object is given importance and other logic is based off that.

File: index.jpg (6KB, 200x252px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 200x252px

>>3098250

>a country built solely on radical empiricism
>this one man proceeds to demolish it

>>3098956
Thank you for simply stating what i can only express in autistic long text.

>>3098472
top kek

>>3098962
philosophy is part of STEAMP

File: stream.jpg (104KB, 1440x384px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1440x384px

>>3099018
It keeps getting longer.

>>3098250
I feel like such a country would ultimately end up committing mass genocide.

>>3098472
it would need some abstract bases to work from it, if not
>diversal genocides
>end of capitalism