Can you justify the Principle of Causality (all change is produced by a cause) as universal without falling to a fallacy of composition?
>>3053585
you're right. Movement and change are illusions, Zeno did nothing wrong.
>>3053588
>have made no claims
>You know, you're right!
>>3053585
>fallacy of composition
why bring up this fallacy in particular? are the other ones fair game?
Causality is a dead meme killed both by Newton and QM.
>>3053714
Because I expect the sciences dealing entirely with causality to come up as evidence to the contrary.