Is there anything more cringe worthy than hearing some critiquer talk about a basic topic in that overly puffed up way they talk about obscure philisophy? It's like they're revealing that they're dumb as fuck.
You see it with economics, sometimes on lit.
>It is clear that the recycling of surplus capital caused by the exploitation of labour trivially proves the necessity of a grand committee to mathematically fix commodity prices immanently for the stability of the system within itself..."
And when Zizek talks about Bill Gates extracting rent. LMAO, no one knows what the fuck he's on about. That is such specious reasonng it barely exists