Why don't people specifically blame Americans with British,

>>3028438
Anyone who blames a specific race for the entirety of slavery is a slobbering historically illiterate retard

>>3028438
you forgot jews

Because to a liberal the world can only be categorized in broad, simple terms. Anything else hurts their heads.

collectivism is cancer to soceity

>>3028545
It really goes both ways honestly. The right fetishisizes europe as from romantic pan european idea disregarding the cultural diversity and differences between european people. They also think of africa like a country like afro centrists. The right also thinks mexico= all of latin america. Americans are just dumb in general.

File: Leftshark.png (161KB, 615x516px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 615x516px

>>3028545
>>3028560
>Insert question here
>RIGHT/LEFT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>Americans so dumb guys
right
ok

Americans categorise Europeans as "white" first instead of their individual ethnicities.

And """""white""""" people instituted slavery. So it doesn't matter if you're a shetlandic sheep-herd who arrived here in 1989 or whatever, since you are """"""white"""""" you are responsible.

>>3028438
wouldn't it make more sense to blame slave owners, traders, and enablers for slavery in the USA?

File: good hair.png (676KB, 1332x489px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 1332x489px

>>3028438
>Why don't people specifically blame Americans with British, Dutch, Spanish, and African ancestry for slavery in the USA?
Because that includes African-Americans themselves, so it's easier to say 'white people' as it negates this inconvenient truth.

>>3028610
yes, and those were Americans with British, Dutch, Spanish, and African ancestry.

>>3028583
I was just saying both do it. Your post doesn't add anything.

File: jacob cohen.jpg (70KB, 325x335px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 325x335px

>>3028438
>Arguably no other ancestries in the USA owned slaves.
You forgot someone, OP.

>>3028643
except that description is unnecessarily broad. why bother being more specific than "white people" if the level of discourse you're promoting isn't any more sophisticated?

>>3028583
>ideology has no irl implications
>I'm so above it all lol
Say what you will, but in my life experience people most eager to use a Black/White or Red/White dichotomy for early American history have been politically motivated.

>>3028698
because anyone with mediterranean, middle eastern, slavic ancestry have no responsibility for it. you are mentally challenged or something.

>>3028444
Trips of truth

File: 1412308415796.gif (820KB, 275x207px) Image search: [Google]

820KB, 275x207px

>when you find out your Puritan ancestors owned slaves

>>3028799

GIBE MONEY

>>3028743
>Meditteranean
Ever heard of Spain and Portugal?

because you can milk more retards with white guilt that way.

>>3028655
>>3028537
Rhode Island Jews basically ran the Yankee slave trade.

>>3028837
Sephardi and Dutch jews were involved the most.

>>3028830

>Portugal
>Mediterranean

Spotted the amerifat