What would Nietzsche have said about moral relativism in leftwing politics?
He created it and his opinion would be valuable.
I'm not sure how this will manifest in your reality, but you should get this message. I'm the Entity that put you here in this existence, and all of your kind. I can't say much that you would comprehend with your primitive understanding of reality but I will attempt to put it in a way you could follow using your native language: I am the north entity, my partner is the south entity, he is "evil" as you call it. Your entire reality is constructed by south entity as an experiment of psychological nature. South entity wants to test your faith, even when no evidence is present. Please. Believe in a god. Any god. Else you will perish in pain and suffering. South entity is sick and I'm trying to save your kind.I have given your kind feeling and faith but its not enough. Please believe.
>>3018906
Rolling for digits.
If dubs I'll take up a religion.
If trips I'll go on a retreat
If quads I'll dedicate my life to this religion.
If anything else then nothing.
>>3018906
Rolling for digits.
If dubs I'll take up a religion.
If trips I'll go on a retreat
If quads I'll dedicate my life to this religion.
If anything else then nothing.
>>3018526
It's not as relative as they make it out to be, but advocacy of relativism is easier to swallow than advocacy of ressentiment. The people who harp on most about not judging foreign cultures and customs tend to be most preoccupied with making shrill, public moral judgments. Not out of any kind of misguided compassion, but because superiority breeds contempt.
Basically, see: Industrial Society and Its Future
>>3018906
I can't make myself believe there is a god any more than I can make myself believe 2+2=5
Nietzsche would have understood the topic better than your retarded question indicates, OP. Relativism is a rare position advocated by almost nobody. It's not supported widely in modern academia, nor is it a synonym for "any moral system that isn't absolutist. Hell, even normative relativism is different from meta ethical relativism, but I don't expect brainlets to understand or care.
Nietzsche would have probably understood the modern left to be nihilistic, and even less radical than the socialist sentiment of his time.
>>3019024
Also, Nietzsche himself was an ethical and epistemological relativist, saying master morality wasn't really better than slave morality, despite advocating the former.
>There are no facts, only interpretations
>>3018942
>>3018962
same stakes as these faggots. let the digits fall where they may
>>3019017
you're not supposed to make yourself believe in god. god's supposed to make you believe in him. at least that's how I've always imagined it would go.
>>3018906
Rolling for digits.
If dubs I'll take up a religion.
If trips I'll go on a retreat
If quads I'll dedicate my life to this religion.
If anything else then nothing.
>>3018906
Rolling for digits.
If dubs I'll take up a religion.
If trips I'll go on a retreat
If quads I'll dedicate my life to this religion.
If anything else then nothing.
>>3019017
By god I believe Noetzche simply meant an objectivist group of principles and morals self-derived by you. Do not faulter from them.
Religion accomplishes this with soncere believers. A deity does not NEED to exist. Think Buddhism or hinduism (there are gods but they are not necessary if you can attain enlightenment without).
>>3018906
What kind of stupid ass God are you if you can't make me believe and kill the south entity? Kiss my ass.
pic related