Why has there been virtually no assassination attempts of Supreme Court justices?
Killing a judge you don't like would be a massive win for your political ideology, and can cause a huge mess for the other side. Look at what happened after Scalia died.
>>3009396
The Republican/Democrat dichotomy does not allow for serious extremism within the ranks.
People who commit political assassinations are too extreme to benefit from either a Republican or a Democrat appointee to the Supreme Court, nobody is willing to go that far for some lukewarm neoliberal stooge party's benefit, which is what both the Republican and Democratic parties are.
So I guess you could chalk it up to political apathy, the Dems and Republicans are so interchangeable that nobody even cares.
>>3009428
I'm sure economically there wouldn't be too much radicialism but on social issues(of course recently gay marriage, but especially abortion), you have guys like the Army of God running around bombing clinics. Surely one of these guys would have shot a justice or two and stacked the court on their favor.
I know you're referring to American SCJs but : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_of_Justice_siege
Judges can be replaced.
Also, if you have to cheat, then you should be aware that you can't win because the majority probably aren't with you... which is why you feel the need to cheat.
This is all obvious.
What is wrong with you?