>When compared with the suppression of anarchy, every other question sinks into insignificance.
What did he mean by this?
Joke's on him, ineffective governance is what leads to anarchy.
>>3000336
Anarchism was a comparatively huge movement from the late 1800s until the Spanish civil war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_anarchism
He was based
Anarchytards deserve the gulag, helicopter and firing squad desu
>>3001945
why?
>>3001945
>they dont think we're legit so lets kill them to prove we are
>>3001952
Most modern anarchists are just thugs with a pretext
The kooky philosophers that mind their business can be left to their devices as long as they're not throwing molotovs
>>3001966
What they believe is only relevant in as much as it compels them into destructive behavior. They should be neutralized ... hmmm... by any means necessary
>>3002189
whats been more destructive than governments in the last century? anarchists dont even come close
>>3000336
The Zeitgeist.
Anarchy would just lead to stupidity and famine. At least Liberalism and Marxism can feasibly function as a state.
>>3002367
What has been MORE constructive than governments in the last century?
Anarchists always raise the evils of the state as an argument whereas they flout the advantages it brings to all whom it concerns
>>3002401
Anarchists oppose this