Was America morally just during WWII? Or were they merely greedy opportunists?
>>2997183
Truman was talking about bait and bleed strategies.
I don't think only entering in the war fully after years of supplying the allies after being attacked directly is really being a greedy opportunist though,
>>2997183
A bit of both, but Germany was 100% in the wrong.
Has there ever been a single time in history when the United States is not an opportunist bastard?
I think not, so, no. The United States helped the Soviets just to play the cat and the mouse with them. If they were really so anti-communist they would have let Hitler make the Soviets porridge.
>>2997183
>get the socialist authoritarian fuckwits to butcher each other in appalling numbers so we can kick both their asses later
I see literally nothing wrong here.
>>2997369
Maybe because most of the people who died were civilians and you could retroactively interpret that statement as supporting the Holocaust and Generalplan Ost.
>>2997183
They were inheriting the british geopolitical mindset. Rule the seas, divide the continent.
>>2997425
It's a good mindset.
>>2997398
>implying we haven't already done exactly that
Google who sold Saddam all that gas he used on the Kurds friend.
>you could retroactively interpret that statement as supporting the Holocaust and Generalplan Ost.
Well supplying arms to the Soviet Union could also be retroactively interpreted (by /pol/) as supporting the genocidal policies of Stalin against Ukrainians and Chechens so it's a Catch-22. The only truly moral choice would be to fight both of them.
>>2997398
What could the US do to stop them from annihilating each other? Early 1942 the US had their hands tied with Japan. What could they have possibly have done to stop it?
>>2997479
Nothing could be done to stop that but outright egging them on and pushing them to kill only makes things worse.