Can someone share some resources about Islam that aren't

>>2954880
>Can someone share some resources about Islam that aren't biased?

I honestly have no idea what this means. Any religious work is heavily biased towards itself. That's the point with the big 3.

"religions" which breeds some level of acceptance, like buddhism (if you call it a religion), are not biased.

ANything you read about Islam will be heavily biased on either side, unless you want to read about their practices and simply just that, then you are looking for how they practice.


I mean, what even is an unbiased conversation about specific religion? In it's unbiased form they are all the same.

Wahhabism is definitely a cancer, but warfare and violence are part of the religion.
Conquering Constantinople is something Islamic leaders thought about autistically. Think about the Hadith concerning the city eventually being Muslim, or the story about Heraclius accepting Islam personally but rejecting it publicly because he was a coward.
Islam isn't all bad but it is obsessed with expansion.

>inb4 Christianity is too
We aren't talking about the christcucks here

>>2954934
>Think about the Hadith
Great, now you've invited the muslim / muslim apologists who say the hadiths don't count.

>>2954951
Qur'anists are considered heretics by the vast majority of Muslims (even if their version of Islam is by far the best) so I wouldn't take them very seriously.

>>2954961
>Qur'anists are considered heretics by the vast majority of Muslims
Funny, these threads seem to become full of them when certain hadiths get mentioned.