Modern US military vs. The Entire World War 2 Armada (including

>>2945870
>modern planes and drones vs WW2 shit
Modern US no contest. The drones alone could eliminate artillery and infantry BTFOing WW2.

>>2945870
Most likely, also i assume you mean the entire armies, not their navies, armada means navy.

Also the Vietnamese army, assuming you just mean the North Vietnamese army, was not all that strong, the U.S. would've ass blasted them in a "fair" war, but they used guerrilla warfare against us, as well as the Vietcong, and the South Vietnamese incompetence.

>>2945870
They would steamroll everyone who participated in WW2 at the peak of their strength.
They might lose in a war of attrition if "Vietnam" includes the US forces in Vietnam as well as the Vietkong.

>>2945870
this is a terrible thread, OP doesn't even bother considering that the modern US's technology is so powerful and remote that they could wipe out entire swathes of enemies at times and locations unheard of back then. sending ICBMs to decimate enemy command posts scouted out by stealth technology or drones would become fucking cake, and would collapse the command structure of a WW2-era united global army.

I hope this thread dies soon

>two US aircraft carrier group parks 1000 miles off of Europe
>launches thousands of railgun rounds
>launches hundreds of drones
>cwis counters all the shitty aircrafts of wwii

>single US aircraft carrier group parks 1000 miles from Asia
>single US aircraft carrier group parks 1000 miles from Africa
etc etc

Only possible if they all spawn inside the US

>>2945870
So does both sides have air support and artillery from their respective time period or is it just an infantry on infantry slugfest? Either way the Entire World War 2 armada would lose