Does Casear deserves to be looked upon as a "villain" or "bad guy" of history?
>>2943293
>JuliusCaesar.jpg
>picture of Augustus
What did he mean by this?
No. He's a hero.
>>2943293
Yes, but only because he ended the Republic, the best and most interesting period in Roman history.
No, the Roman Senate was corrupt and decadent. Also the Republic was already doomed due to Sulla, maybe even before that.
>>2943295
>Gaius Julius Caesar Divi Filius Augustus
>>2943314
As we all know the Empire was never corrupt or decadent and proved to be a very stable form government.
>>2943324
It was, but the the government change extended it's lifespan for another couple of centuries. The republic would have probably fell in 200.
>>2943293
Neutral. He was the culmination of years of senate corruption.
>>2943322
> Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus
>>2943293
He was the hero Rome needed, but didn't deserve.
>>2943334
How can you know it would have fallen then?
>>2943414
The republic? It was already corrupt, inefficient, and bloated. The peasants were on the verge of rebellion, and we all know that a bunch of peasants running around with sticks never create an efficient government.
>>2943293
>Does Casear deserves to be looked upon as a "villain" or "bad guy" of history?
Everyone except Moses is the bad guy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRrODsTV32k
>>2943293
>History is divided into good guys and bad guys like it's a child's narrative
Get off this board
>>2943324
With the exception of two brief civil wars, the Empire from Augustus to Alexander Severus proved the most internally stable period in the entirety of Roman history