>"there's no archeological evidence that people from the 2000s owned personal washing machines"
>"they would actually have a separate community building called a laundromat where they would take their clothes for a wash"
>"what else... oh right, 2000s era washing machines could only handle one article of clothing at a time. hence why laundromat had so many of them"
>"another point about early washing machines... ehhh... right, they didn't have municipal detergent lines feeding into them. you actually had to go out and buy laundry detergent in gallon jugs. this was actually great because you could choose your scent"
>>2933618
Oi, where's your washing machine license, citizen?
>>2933618
Except that we have literally thousands of videos, books, articles and Internet posts about washing machines being used in houses you retard
>>2933618
Tell me about Lindy, why does he like beige?
>>2933646
only three early internet servers actually survived. but i know you /neopol/tards believe the HyperJews are keeping the rest hidden from us
>>2933659
Even without internet servers, there's plenty of movies in dvds and videotapes and millions of magazines and books
>>2933666
yeah right like i'm gonna trust you and your satan trips
>Now you might be wondering - if those washing machines were so great, why aren't we digging up more of them nowadays?
>Well I put it to you, and this is just a thought mind you - that people never actually used them.
>You see, a hunk of plastic and metal like that would be STUPENDOUSLY expensive and inefficient
>Not to mention that the instructions manual would be in French, and no one actually spoke French - that'd be preposterous!
>No - I am sure people would actually wash their clothes someplace more convenient, like... I don't know, a river?
>You see, back when I was doing HEMA...