How often in history have leaders been morally justified to fool the public for the public's own benefit?
Here's one example.
How was the Hart-Celler act for the public's own benefit?
The only thing it might've improved was America's reputation amongst the third world, if America didn't spend most of the 20th century waging campaigns of terrorism against it
>>2931559
It helped diversify the United States, and like you said, improved America's reputation. Diversity makes the economy better and students more innovative, and companies with diverse boards perform better.
>>2931594
>Diversity makes the economy better
Anything for a shekel, right shlomo?
>>2932493
haha jews am i rite lol!
>fool the public for the public's own benefit
leftists unironically believe this
>>2931594
>when your capitalists overlords flood the country with under-educated backwards cultures because they needed more cheap nannies and gardeners
Hitler was right
>>2931532
How has destroying America been in the publica interest?
>>2932638
>/pol/ needs to leave
But I thought you goys liked open boarders and diversity :^)
Don't tell me you are discriminating against people.
>>2931594
So are we talking about diversity of thought here or do i really have to believe that hiring a bunch of blacks and trannies is going to improve a company through the virtue of their skin color or self appointed sex?
>>2931532
I believe the elite has a good reason and purpose for everything. Most people are simply too stupid to make their own decisions.