The whole world is wiped out except for a single country. Which

>>2930683
the fucking vatican

fuck you

>>2930705
And they all starve because there's nothing there, LARPer

>>2930683
Finland, always Finland.

>>2931021
Korea as well to reenact the Hyper War.

>>2930683

USA. No other single country would preserve as much human biodiversity.

>>2930683
Uzbeckistan

>>2931030
>implying all of Europe isn't a cestpool of races at this point

>>2930683
Tuvalu

File: 1495397312436.png (4KB, 312x268px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 312x268px

tfw we will never get a movie about the 4th galatic finno-korean hyper war featuring tbe last stand of the 300 obi wan kenobis on the highest ground in the universe facing the finno-protoss death fleet

>>2930683
None.

>>2931033
>implying its anywhere near as severe as the US
>implying European countries have anywhere near the same population as the US

>>2931038
Great, now you made me want to commit suicide.

File: Itlaybeautiful.jpg (122KB, 900x558px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 900x558px

>>2930683
>I choose China

Fucking kill yourself you disgusting chinkaboo, chinks are ants and their country is an ugly pollute anthill.

I choose Italy of course, the country with the most soul, beauty, intelligence, creativity, passion and the best ethics.

They can carry humanity on the shoulders any day like they've always done.

>>2931046
t.luigi
Your country hasn't been relevant in centuries and is just a glorified tourist spot at this point.

Denmark, good culture and values, but not quite as muslim infected as Norway or Sweden and it has a bigger population than Finland. Second choice would be Japan.

>>2930683
Russia-- actual history preserved, large landmass, a variety of races and religions unspoiled resources.

Alaska

>>2930683
Does everyone else just die or does the rest of the world sink into the ocean?

>>2931174
Best answer itt.

>>2931151
Kill yourself you nu male chink lover.

>>2931294
>being this asshurt

>>2931030
This. It's a country with strong infrastructure (memes about Detroit or whatever aside), a large population with a relatively high level of education and a lot of diversity. That may trigger /pol/, and admittedly a homogenous European ethnostate might have lower crime rates etc, but diversity is a good thing when literally everybody else is getting wiped out.

I'm confident that civilization would be preserved in the US - maybe not the totality of it, but in portions. I'm not sure of that for any other countries. Certainly not Russia or China. Russia is too dysfunctional even today, and China is too backwards. Also, its population is too urban; most of them wouldn't last a week.

File: 7ba48e3eb002daa38676d346d92e0df4.jpg (90KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 640x640px

El Perú

>>2931038
Sorry, pop cultural references don't become any funnier just because it's nerd culture

Probably Switzerland.

They're got peace, guns, and money. I'd pick one of the Scandi countries, but too many Muslims would survive.

>>2931046
>i pick dysfunctinoal mafia state that never should have existed

Canada, because I live there.

>>2930683
Brazil because then i survive

I agree with the US (self-preservation bias aside), it has lots of natural resources, touches almost every climate zone on earth, has a large population and lots of hospitable land, among other things. Being developed helps too

>>2930683
Iceland

>>2930683
turkey. the roaches will always survive.

>>2931030
I hate to break it to you but according to historical demographics the modern West isn't the most ethnically diverse place known to mankind.

>>2931560
>Also, its population is too urban; most of them wouldn't last a week.
China has a higher percentage of rural residents than the U.S. which is struggling to find farmers.

>>2932349
Doesn't China import most of its wheat and beef from the US

Japan they are now resistant to nukes after that first hit and they are the cou try with the least jackasses and they actually are polite.

>>2930683

Switzerland, no question.

>>2931584
Irónicamente, creo que Lima es uno de esos lugares que deberían ser destruidos por una bomba atómica.
Arequipa, Qusqu, and Amazonia are fine though.

I chose USA/Canada because we are the best country on the planet

>>2932356
Could be thanks to the advent of mega farms and dairies but China and most of the East have traditionally been rice cultivating fish eating societies. Taiwan banned U.S beef cause of ractomine.

>>2932349
Yeah, I spoke imprecisely. I don't mean that China lacks for farmers. What I mean is that China's urban population is just too large (talking absolute numbers here, not relative ones) and too dense and too reliant on a complex net of infrastructure and imports that would collapse catastrophically if the rest of the world's population went poof. China's eastern seaboard would be a mass grave for tens (probably hundreds) of millions within a matter of months.

America's cities would be in bad shape too, of course, but less so.

>>2930683

Either Norway or Australia.

>>2932741
You just picked two countries that would collapse in a couple of weeks. Just too reliant on foreign imports.

>>2930683
Obviously Iraq.

You can't rebuild civilization from the roof. Only the foundation stone.

>>2932744

Norway would be fine, but the Aussies would surely go mad max, they're loaded with nutjob cults and the like

File: newdaily_300914_trump.jpg (440KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 800x600px

>>2931030
>implying USA won't be the cause of the world being wiped out

>>2930683
>China
HAHAAHAHAHAHAHA

>>2932752
Norway would not be fine, dude. It imports literally half its food. Sure, there'd be plenty of food and arable land elsewhere, but a mass panic over starvation & possible famine is not a great footing to restart civilization from.

Australia would actually probably be better off, but neither country really has the capacity to be self-sufficient. Small populations, and too isolated geographically.

File: hindustan_map.gif (26KB, 320x233px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 320x233px

>>2930683
India

File: modi.jpg (37KB, 672x504px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 672x504px

>>2932780
>no sri lanka

File: main-qimg-70aabb4b99ce5caa6620377cfb062ffa-c.jpg (142KB, 602x595px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 602x595px

>>2932780
>Not posting all of Greater India's rightful territory

>>2932775

I don't know the status of Norway's food availability, nor its current farming practices, but I know it has ever been highly agrarian in its past, if not poor, off the top of my head I don't think it has a very large population, surely it could sustain its population on its arable land, in spite of the short growing season they ought to have.

>>2932798
Usually "muh clay" is based on some sort of historical basis, but that landmass pictured has never existed.

File: King Alfred The Great.jpg (83KB, 615x756px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 615x756px

If we are trying to salvage the best of humanity then you have to save the English

>>2930683
USA

>>2932812
that landmass does exist lad, but you're right the geo-political entity that came closest to that is probable the Raj lel

>>2930683
Either China or Japan

>>2931046
>shitaly
>carrying humanity

Calm down Luigi.

>>2932809
They were dependent on foreign imports (mostly grain from Denmark) even back then, despite being largely agrarian. There was a serious famine in Norway in 1812-13 when the British blockaded them.

But more importantly, Norway isn't particularly agrarian anymore, and even if it COULD hypothetically produce enough food to feed its population (I'm not gonna crunch the numbers but it probably does have enough arable land, given modern farming technology), it ... doesn't. I mean, if they had foreknowledge of whatever magical event would cause the rest of the human population to go *poof*, then maybe. But as it stands not enough Norwegians are farmers and they don't have enough dedicated farmland.

Realistically China.

>large population
>some racial diversity
>gigantic industry, big part of the current world's
>alot of agriculture
>ALOT of land to cultivate

File: kkOHdL5.jpg (80KB, 771x960px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 771x960px

>>2932812
t. Anglo revisionist

>>2930683
China or the US
realistically those are the two countries that could best maintain a modern standard of living if the rest of the world went poof

>>2933155

>USA planet
>coruscant
>China planet
>mustafar

File: 1.01_all_groups_2012.jpg (1MB, 2200x1700px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2200x1700px

>>2930683
Whether we like it or not, USA is the only rational option.
Not only is it large, populous and developed, but it has ethnic groups from all over the world, Russians, Filipinos, Italians, Koreans whatever you want. So this the highest change to preserve most of human culture.

You can probably restore most countries in the world using the ethnic communities in the US.

>>2930683
France will make Humanity great again

USA is only option and possibly russia.

The biggest problem is nit agriculture importa which will cause mass famine until a sustainable crop to person ratio is sutained. The US has the bread basket and a large agricultural area, not to mention some of the smartest scientists in the world which could help in the collapse in society tha will happen. But the army would be downsized and alot of people will be funneled inro agriculture and manual labor and if push comes to shove slavery will be re introduced

>>2932311
Underrated post.