It's 1917, and after Russia's surrender in late 1916, the German Army has captured Paris, and Italy is on the verge of collapse.
What does Britain do in this situation? It (as well as Portugal and Japan) are safe from invasion and more or less dominate the seas, Germany's colonies have mostly been seized, and Britain is advancing into Ottoman territory in the Levant. Does the Anglo continue the war or seek a white peace?
>>2919041
Peace with Germany, maybe Austro-Hungary. The Ottomans war goes on, and the Treaty of Sevres is eventually forced on the Turks. However, the Greeks in this situation realize the allies are in no position to help them, thus they never start the Greco-Turkish war.
They drag America into the war
Oh wait
The Americans realize they're never going get their loans paid back at this rate and enter the war with the causus belli of one of their many sunken boats.
>>2919041
Sue for peace. If the Germans have captured Paris, then continuing the fight is pointless.
>>2919173
Benjamin Friedman was an ex Zionist who converted to Catholicism. He came clean about what happened behind the curtains in World War 1.
https://youtu.be/x8OmxI2AYV8
This red pill takes a while to digest so beware.
>>2919173
There's no reddit pilling to be done, it's simple. The Americans loaned a lot of money to the French and British during the war, and shipped a lot of materiel on loan. They're never going to get their money back if the Germans win.
>>2919041
Continue the war. Germany has no chance to win, the Brits have endless resources in their colonies to keep throwing at Germany and their total naval superiority means they can continue to starve the G*rm filth.
>>2919201
then go to war with Britain and France and try to take their colonies
>>2919205
>they can continue to starve the G*rm filth.
As well as the rest of the continent. But fuck em, Brexit FTW.