Why were Nazi commandants tried and executed for running concentration

File: IMG_1465.jpg (66KB, 705x486px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 705x486px

Were the victims Jews, God's chosen people? I thought so.

Nothing to see here, you filthy stormfag.

>>2917189
Because the British won and the Germans lost. That's really the only difference.

inb4 "Boers are evil racists and deserved it and Jews dindu nuffin wrong"

>>2917189

It's almost like losing wars has consequences.

>>2917189

No-one was tried or executed for concentration camps, only for death camps.

The real question is, why are you filth unable to make a case without lying?

File: roosevelt-stalin.jpg (57KB, 720x537px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 720x537px

>>2917189
beacause commies were best american allies, just like in Vietnam

>>2917189
Man you neo-nazis will do or say absolutely anything to try and spread the blame and make the Nazi's crimes lesser. It's astonishing. And for you to brazenly try and post it here to sway people's minds or cast doubt on the subject is appalling. How sad your life must be.

>>2917189

They were executed for the death camps, not just concentration camps.

File: IMG_1588.jpg (156KB, 542x1099px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 542x1099px

>>2917243
Get a load of this commieboo

Because one was a system specifically designed to industrially work to death or directly kill people as their main purpose. The other one killed people by incompetence.

>>2917204
What consequences, persecution or trial did the United States face for losing in Vietnam? Did the Soviet Union face anything similar for losing in Afghanistan?

>>2917213
>Ilse Koch never had a trial

>>2917296

The US suffered significant social upheaval during and after the Vietnam war.

>>2917189
>why were people executed for the deliberate killings of civilised peoples
Vs
>why were people who housed enemy civilians and gave them a lower death rate than the imperial capital not killed
Really makes you think

>>2917314
And that's the same as being put on trial for war crimes, sent to prison and executed.

>>2917189
>why were people executed for the deliberate killings of civilised peoples
Vs
>why were people who housed enemy civilians and gave them a lower death rate than the imperial capital not killed
Really makes you think

>>2917321
>communist prisoners captured for labor
>execute workers and hurt the economy

Seems logical