For the sake of the discussion, let's suppose that morality

if its not a spook then you should do it because its the right thing to do

>>2911183
if it's not a spook then that would presume that there is a logical reason for you to be moral. how ever you hypothetically make morality objective would inherently answer your question

File: 13t356544.gif (167KB, 500x275px)

167KB, 500x275px

>>2911183
>It's time for another thread of spooks accusing spooks of being spooks
Maybe this one will be different

>>2911187
>because its the right thing to do
Tautology.

>>2911188
>that would presume that there is a logical reason for you to be moral
No, it doesn't.

>>2911183
>For the sake of the discussion, let's suppose that morality is not a spook. Then tell me, /his/: why should I be moral?
Because the obligation of acting morally is contained within the term 'morality' itself. Morality is a set of rules of conduct, and a rule you are not obliged to follow is not a rule - the term 'rule' presumes an obligation of following it, as without it, 'rule' has no meaning as a term. So, if you uphold morality, you also uphold the obligation to act according to it.

>spooks
Just end your life my man.

File: Kunt.jpg (206KB, 710x735px)

206KB, 710x735px

>>2911183
Because it's your duty, you spook faggot

>>2911370
inb4 OP claims tautology again as if that negates the answer.

You just should. There are certain background things that are true.

Should laws reflect morality? As we make laws that enforce our morality via outlawing murder, rape, etc, should we not legalize things that are amoral?

Is drug use amoral? If not what is immoral about it? I don't mean citing crime as a result of dependency like robbing someone to get money to buy the drugs, but the drug use itself.

Is locking people in penitentiaries a moral way to "rehabilitate" convicts? Is our system hypocritical?

I still can't fathom how far our nation is advanced and yet our criminal justice system is still so flawed and archaic. Progress needs to be made.