Is recognizing that you are too stupid and uninformed to cast a vote noble and respectable?
>>2903810
I'd say so, but people who'd be "too dumb to vote" probably wouldn't give a fuck anyways.
>>2903810
The main problem is that people who are intelligent and informed enough to vote rationally make up 0.0001% of the population and you have 99.9999% of population voting as if they're placing bets on their favorite sports team.
Removing the people who are intelligent enough to at least recognize they are inadequately informed about politics would do nothing at best.
>>2903831
This.
You can't be intelligent enough to recognize that you are not intelligent enough to vote. If you feel this way, you either have simply not bothered to look into the candidates, or have extremely underrated your own intelligence.
No, because if you're self-aware enough to recognize that you're probably smart enough to inform yourself, but you can't be assed. A majority of idiots who are too dumb to cast an intelligent ballot cast their ballot with extreme confidence.
not unless you attempt to inform yourself
There's no such thing as too dumb to vote. It might sound noble, but all it is is an admittance that you're too lazy to do the proper amount of research towards what you're voting for or against.