Is every philosophy that's not hedonism just beta males trying to cope with their failure?
>>2895171
Some forms of hedonism are just people trying to cope with their failiures in other areas.
Epicureanism is where it's at.
>>2895171
Maybe. If you were immortal. Why would I want to be able to do whatever I wanted? Sounds boring, tbqhwyfam.
Death and taxes, friendo. Somethin's gonna keep you in check whether you like it or not.
"Life" doesn't end in "-ism".
>>2895171
yes, unless you come up with a counterexample
fuck off Chad
>>2895171
There's one exception, asceticism opposite of hedonism, if it's for the sake of virgins in paradise
>>2895171
>this mindset
>philosophy of the 21st century
>>2897414
>if it's for the sake of virgins in paradise
So, hedonism.
>>2895185
>Epicureanism is where it's at.
this
>>2895171
>Is every philosophy that's not hedonism just beta males trying to cope with their failure?
Yes absolutely.
Instead of developing their Philosophies through the pursuit of truth, everyone that doesn't believe Soma tablets are the answer to everything is simply insecure.
>also neglects the fact that the most hedonistic men on the planet are the biggest cucks
>>2897843
>le "6 gorrilion genders are scientifically based" man
Into the trash it goes
>>2895171
>Hedonists
>Not beta males
>>2897896
Is that all you took from what I said.
Do you even think I give a shit who's in the image macro.
Is this the kind of alpha hedonist I'm up against?
>>2895171
Every philosophy is just beta males trying to cope and justify failure.
People advance through conscious cybernetics of local problem spaces. In less spergy terms: You try actions and if they fail, you examine the reasons for failure. After thinking you can either alter your behavior, dismiss the failure of your strategy as unfortunate circumstance, or (what most people do) repeat your failing strategy mindlessly. You can't go with top-down platonism when local minima and maxima are different in every region.