>Tfw this is a male dominant board (and site for the most part) so not able to have extensive discussions about historical fashion throughout different Eras and places.
>TFW war, /pol/ bait threads, and same old philosophy threads get boring or banal after a while.
Stop being a dandy and read war history.
>>2886224
I'll give you credit for not using double spacing but get off your phone.
If you want to start an actual thread instead of a bait thread start an actual thread.
>>2886224
I'm kind of fascinated by historical clothes but only for sexual fantasies.
Says who? I'll post what little I have, it's also one of my favorite subjects.
I don't much appeal in historical fashions from the female side. Compared to male fashions, women's seem plain and samey throughout most times and places. I feel bad for the women who go to reenacting events dressed in a boring peasant woman's dress while their husbands wear cool uniforms.
>>2886224
Okay what the fuck was up with these wigs why did people want to look old
>>2886246
I'm on a tablet. But yeah I guess I can do that. How can you tell anyway?
>>2886252
I guess. With Egypt and Crete being the exceptions, most cultures had their women at least(if not men as well) dress pretty conservatively. Though I imagine it had to do with the climate too. That and the fact more cloth you can afford to wrap around yourself=wealth
>>2886258
Why is Vietnamese fashion soo cutie? I also like Chinese Hanfu. Han dynasty was best dynasty!
>>2886275
>dress pretty conservatively
Which can be pretty sexy. Imagine all these women in their respective climates ungirding themselves or being ripped naked and raped by armored and toga men.
>>2886262
Brah...what are you taking about? In terms of peasants? novel females throughout history had some of the most elaborate costumes and hair styles. Men, for the most part(except for Renaissance ) was more plain.
>>2886302
Oh I don't disagree. Conservative dress is often much more elegant and beautiful in my opinion.Mostly with how they combined colors or make elaborate designs. I was just responding ding to anon's comment about being turned on...unless you're him and you happen to have a fetish for more elegant styles.
>>2886303
Women's clothing doesn't compare.
>>2886325
I am him and I certainly do. And history has just had so much variety.
>>2886334
>>2886303 Meant Noble*
And yeah soldier uniforms were pretty handsome(I especially like the French and Roman legionnaire) but nothing tops these elaborate disease for women's clothing throughout history.
>>2886276
Pushing for historical figures in streetwear I see.
>>2886224
Bro I'm at this moment attempting to do historical clothing recreations of Mesoamerica. Already did the illustrations of the designs (which are occasionally posted here) and research and have models willing. Just collecting fabrics atm.
>>2886297
>>2886389
*reconstructions.
>>2886269
During France in the 1700's it was a symbol of power. It cost a lot of money to be able to make white wigs and they would put powder in them to make them look white longer. It was also less damaging to the wig than using straight up dye.
>>2886344
Sure did. Am I the only one who gets kind of upset when a historical movie set in a specific time period fails to show clothing accurate to that time or even more often, place? English,Spanish, German, and French medieval fashion was not interchangeable REEEEEEEE!
>Has movie set in the dark ages, have women wearing renaissance dresses and knights wearing full plate.
>>2886394
Alright, but was there any rationalization for the aesthetics of it?
>>2886224
You aren't able to have extensive discussions about historical fashion because no one gives a shit and it isn't interesting. What is interesting is making note of how many non-white cultures have actually succeeded in the history of humanity.
>>2886262
cute
>>2886325
I agree, conservative dress done right actually makes women look much more attractive. Pic related.
>>2886401
Not really. Louis XIV started going bald at a young age and ordered a wig similar in style to the ones the other aristocrats started wearing. It was just a trend that caught on.
At least that's how I understand it.
4chan has more female posters than you would probably expect. The whole tits or gtfo meme just taught them not to flaunt it and blend in.
Those kids on the top left of your pick are cute OP.
Good thread
>>2886450
It's not bait, if you'd like I can have an in-depth discussion about Mesoamerican clothing, shall we start with gauze weave that produced sheer textiles (still worn in some communities in Mexico today)? Such as pic related of a Maya noblewoman. Or should I talk about the various ways to upper body garments of women in the region?
>>2886269
It's not exactly rare. I'm not sure how much the Japanese chonmage had to do with helmets rather than looking like you're balding (and thus older) but younger men who got the cut were 100% trying to look older either way.
>>2886395
That dutch nobleman is looking fly
>>2886510
Would you mind actually explaining? I'm really interested. Would love to see some of the pictures too.
>peasant women won't dress like this again
>>2886258
From one enthusiast to another, I have a question. Why does it seem like Japanese noble women didn't wear much jewelry, especially earrings, throughout the history of their culture? Outside, golden hairpins of course. It seemed very common throughout the world for status and expensive jewels+ cloth to go together. >>2886391
Even the Chinese,Tai and Vietnamese no nobles had jewels in excess.
Also next post this will be a historical Tai fashion thread.
>>2886510
I'd say both. We can start with upper garments of women. Though noble women dress always seems much more interesting...
>>2886532
Japanese barber:so what would you like today, son?
Edo/sengoku samurai:JUST FUCK MY SHIT UP
>>2886265
>those huge Tang titties
>>2886334
This is my guilty pleasure desu.
>>2886487
Agreed
>>2886545
>>2886566
Alright well upperbody garments for women varied depending on the region of Mesoamerica and era. The Maya probably have some of the most extensive references so I'll start with them. Before I start, I'll just mention that the most basic clothing item for women was the skirt which started at the waist and fell either to the feet or knees.
In the Preclassic (1200 bc- c.200) Maya women are not shown wearing much upper body garments. Pic related is from San Bartolo, a mural dating to 100 bc. The women can be seen surrounding the standing red figure which may the maize deity and the women around him his wives. The figure with the black paint on the face kneeling before him is not a female though. The style has Olmec influence still, and Olmec women are usually depicted naked or with skirts only. In the Classic period you start to see more upperbody garments.
>>2886645
Of what?England? France? sorry it just grinds my gears when people generalize European fashion at that time without referencing the nation.THIS is the correct way.
>>2886561
This to better illustrate my meaning. I guess the most similar to the Japanese with that were the Koreans.
>>2886535
>>2886677
>>2886677
In the Classic period (c.200-900) you see upperbody garments of women vary a lot. The woman with the sheer clothing I first posted comes from this period. The usual upperbody garment was a huipil (a sleeveless blouse). Usually these were big, with arm holes starting at the elbow length or even to the wrists, draping the whole body. These were intricately colored and designed especially among the higher classes. They were made of cotton weaved on a backstrap loom, or made maguey fiber (a plant with a milky sap that was also used as a fermented drink). Here is an example of a Maya lady of Tikal greeting a king with her huipil.
>>2886761
>>2886677
From what kinds of records do scholars get this information about Mesoamerica? I've heard most of the records were destroyed by Spanish chimpouts.
>>2886224
We need to bring cleavage'd bodices back.
>>2886784
You literally see more cleavages nowadays than in the 18th century, tf.
>>2886784
Perhaps. But I like all types of bodices
>>2886761
These were buried in ruins by the time the conquistadors came, and the art work of this period is pretty clear. So some from archeology, and also from Spanish and other Europeans exploring who wrote information down. Undoubtedly we would know more if so many codices weren't deliberately destroyed. Mesoamerica also has the bad luck of having poor climate for preservation so many textiles and books of earlier periods were destroyed by the climate. This is also why we have no wood or feather art, not to mention body art. So we only have a small bit of actual Mesoamerican artwork survive.
>>2886761
Some huipils had very low cuts, to the point that breasts and nipples were visible. Such as this woman with a hat. Though these lowcuts are speculated to be worn by courtesans, women who entertain men and do them favors (sorta like geishas or escorts).
>>2886828
Danke
>>2886798
Not in a formal setting. And when they do, they usually just show the crack, not the whole top halves of tits.
Tank tops are pretty damn informal.
>>2886781
Here are the tai photo bombs
>>2886276
Were these the Visagoths? Didn't know their women were basically topless.
>>2886391
Was this type of garment a thing? It's really pretty actually
>>2886914
Inaccurate movie prop shit.
Try this one.
>>2886926
>>2886973
which era
>>2886914
Wtf is that hair? Kill it
>>2886705
Is that man on the bottom right pregnant?
>>2887001
Naw just really fat.
>>2886997
Seriously, it's almost like cornrows in a bun
>>2886938
Sea Peoples or people of the Aegan sea I think, this is bronze age by the looks of it.
>>2886973
Forgive me. How could I be such a pleb?
>>2887058
Awesome. Thanks anon
>>2886973
>>2887067
Forgot pic.
>>2886588
For your pleasure.
>>2886532
Some more hair variations.Ignore the weeb shit.
>>2886825
Aside from huipils Maya women in the Classic period also occassionally had capes over their huipils, or wore rounded quechquemitls. Sometimes they wore sarongs that wrapped under the arms, and hung down to the thighs. A longer one piece sarong that wrapped the whole body was also sometimes worn.
In the Postclassic period (c.1000-1500) you get new garments like the netted top, scarf-like jacket, and mexican style quechquemitl. Toplessness appears to have occured throughout their history too. In the postclassic period it was more common inland, while on the coast they tended to wear upper body garments more. Commoners likely were topless as well. Pic related gives you a good idea of Mesoamerican clothing for women in general, including the Maya.
>>2886825
Do you have pics of actors wearing them or sketches?
>>2887094
Pictures I drew or from Maya artwork of the courtesans?
>>2886973
Even this type of armor was probably ceremonial.
>>2887078
wew lad
>>2886429
That's kinda pathetic, I assumed there would be more nuanced fanciness to it.
what would this board look like if the genders were flipped? would it be less military history dominated?
>>2887256
IMO, most women I know who are into history are less about fashion, and more about obsessing with the world's royalty and nobility.
>>2887294
He has the coolest title. Motherfucking Dragon King.
>>2887256
Mythology, historical fashion, historical food and probably irl disney princesses and some philosophy.
Minimalist modernist traditionalist fashion is where it's at homie.
>>2887420
Gonna dump some /fa/ shit
>>2887425
>>2887430
>>2887433
>>2887435
>>2887438
>>2886391
>1919
>long hair
whore
>>2887439
>>2887443
>>2887444
>>2887449
>>2887451
>>2887453
>>2887458
>>2886224
>Femininity is defined by superficial concerns like hair, face paint, and garments
Thank you for reaffirming my misogyny op, was almost starting to think of women as people for a moment there.
>>2887472
>Masculinity is defined by superficial concerns like ego, war, and toughness
I'd rather hang out with the bitches, at least they're prettier to look at
>>2887472
>Femininity is defined by superficial concerns
>Thank you for reaffirming my misogyny
>t. pathetic beta that can't into girls and claims traps are superior
>>2887472
girls are ok, contrary to popular belief they aren't all stacys and bitchy.
>>2886224
>tfw I literally have that fucking book
Holy shit. Scholastic book called The Romans. Breddy gudd condensed history for kids.
Post the marriage page OP.
>>2887533
Do they shave off their eyebrows and paint them on, or just colour their eyebrows white?
Also why the fuck is the timespan so short, do the emperors demand how eyebrows look every couple years or some shit?
>>2887481
Nope. Masculinity has grinding and innovation under its belt. You can shit on egotism and aggression all day, but the fact you were able to punch out that message and deploy it for people on the other side of the planet to look at is because of weaponized male predominant autism.
>>2887584
I don't care at all about girls being "bitchy." That isn't a negative to me. The negative is how apparently everything characteristic of femininity is some variation of dress up. I really wish it weren't this way. It's disappointing. I would be disappointed in a man who was preoccupied with appearance issues too.
What in your opinions are some decent looking historical fashion that is likely to make a resurgence, or at least has a possibility to?
>>2887757
Greek linen/cotton wraps and dresses
>>2887778
I wish m8, but why do you think that?
>>2887757
Probablities? Early 19th. Very fit clothes, colorful etc.
What I like more tough it's the late 16th early 17th century males clothes with some modifcations (not so baggy and without the horridcollars), best hats and general cut of clothes, I would only make the trousers a bit larger. It's cool in both Western and Eastern europe. The greatest travesty of the 20th and 21th century to me is than everyone dress the same, be it New York, Brasilia, Paris, Tokyo or Laos, the same cut and overall style.
>>2887256
I'm not saying world history is absolutely boring, just wish there could be more variety in what is being talked about.
>>2887441
I don't get it what's wrong? I'm sure it was a variant of many other hair styles of the time Anon.
>>2887472
>Because OP is also into historical fashion, that means that is all she is into.
Thank you so reaffirming why you are a mysogynist anon
>>2887668
I'm not sure it was men orchestrating women's fashion all the while. I mean I'm sure they had a part in it but, it seems women have always mostly been the ones dictating tiny details in fashion historically. I mean, that is all they were able to focus on historically anyway.
>>2887757
In all honesty, for women, I would say the Roman style of stola. As for men, perhaps some 1920s fashion. I can't see male robes or "dresses" ever being popular in the west for men again.
Most Asian cultures
are usually wearing their ancestral clothing as formal or traditional wear though
>>2887449
Who are middle eastern men so hot bros?
>>2887902
I think asians with some encouragment and a few mini social movements could easily start wearing more traditional clothes, probably only 1/3 or so for quite westernized Asian nations
Europe and the west needs some massive political or cultural overhaul for that, like if some billionaires created some pet project cities/towns or elon musk had some fancy as fuck plans for colonial suits, which might influence the rest of society trying to be modern (Which would actually based off old stuff)
>>2887610
Naw I don't just found it online, it would be cool if you could post it though
>>2887867
>>2887256
War*
I'm sure any women are also into war history. It would just be great to have a combination of that and ordinary aspects of life.
>>2886334
Never understood these hats.
>>2886798
I don't.
>>2887930
IDK, I feel like Asians and middle eastern type people are still generally wearing their traditional garments today. If only for special occasions like weddings or festivals. Western men do not at all.
Scottish, I think.
>>2888020
Im talking about daily life
The only ones that seem to do that are some middle eastern and indian nations, and even then only the females in india really do, and the main think keeping it alive in the middle east is its religious and practical for the desert
Seljuk turk
Historical fashion is a fascinating concept, but when you realize that for most of history people didn't bath, were sweaty, used a fuck ton of oils and shit on their head, unshaven girls, and how they were surrounded by shit and piss with no wiping, it becomes quite hard to get invested in the topic.
This costume (Chokha) has been appropriated by Ukrainian and Russian Cossacks since the 19th century, but this is actually a Georgian traditional costume : http://tcherkesse.free.fr/folklore/costumes.traditionnels.html
This costume is said to be of Berber origin, but I believe it is Greek or Balkanic. Especially the Brandebourg knots. What do you think ?
>>2888054
Are those things on the chest bullets?
The non-shit version.
>>2888070
Yes.
>>2887248
No different than Yeezys
>16th century
Did any other people remain /fa/ for so long before descending into shirt and trouser mediocrity?
>>2886269
>some king goes bald
>wears a shitty obvious wig
>sycophants start wearing wigs
>discover shaving your hair off is a good way to deal with headlice
>soon everyone is wearing wigs
>ostentatious display intensifies
>white wigs are the most expensive
>poorcucks have to dust it with starch to lighten it
>soon wig powder is a thriving industry
>napoleonic wars happen
>gub decides to tax wig powder
>everyone stops using wigs except judges because law doesn't change with the fashion or something
>>2886224
Why the fuck thee are no one makes historical porn anymore?
Fuck miss the 70's, back then porn had budget and a decent plot.
>Used lead to sweeten wine
>Used arsenic for cosmetic purposes
>People wonder why the Roman Empire died a painful death and why the "H""R""E" turned out to be the most retarded empire in it's time
ishygddt
>>2887248
I always thought looking old = prestige since people didn't get to live as long.
>>2887461
Lombards?
>He feel for the pants meme
>>2887902
>the one titty shirt is never coming back into style
>>2888609
Gauls. Notice the hog emblem.
>>2888618
>Translucent togas will never become fashionable again
>>2888226
This. Now kids just want the action.
>>2887927
>>2888036
True. For what it's worth though, I know quite a few Indians that wear traditional garb for dressing up for a secular dinner or an event (outside of religious purposes or weddings). A bit less for East Asians though, except likely the WWII generation.
I will never see that with Europeans/Americans except the Scottish and their kilts during festivals.
>>2886532
Not posting superior ainu facial hair
>>2887433
What is this? Gauls?
>>2886224
>Men don't like historical fashion
This thread is proof of your ignorance.
>>2887668
And for the record, yes the eyebrows were shaved off lol. I guess in ages cases, they may have been shaved very thin then covered with powder. It became a thing in Heian period Japan too (I guess they thought they could rebel against Chinese fashions and culture at the time by wearing Chinese cosmetics from the 700s)lol
>>2888020
Problem is that modern suits and ties and shit is a direct evolution of fashion and is not in any way alien to most western nations, as the entire trend of wearing what would later become them began in the 16th century.
>>2888816
I was just afraid no one would respond with well thought out responses besides just pics of cool armor and cute wifus but I was wrong indeed. >>2887090
I wish we could have full on thread discussions start out with specifics of fashion in a period though. Like when did this garment or cosmetic begin and why? The introduction of new color palettes, dying techniques, etc. Often times, explanations are about as interesting as why certain armor or weapons were used.
>>2888068
Its Turkish
>>2888886
Pic related
>>2888891
>>2886352
Did the creator of that picture not notice that his background makes the text entirely unreadable?
>>2887930
In Hanoi I saw more women going to work in traditional dresses than in modern western clothes. Even the young girls often wear traditional clothes for any sort of celebration or special activity.
>>2888852
Daily reminder this was considered hot at one point.
>>2888277
>since people didn't get to live as long.
They did though.
>>2888971
Non-daily reminder that a daily reminder is only daily if you do it daily.
>>2888977
>Reminder this was considered hot at one point*
Better?
>>2888942
I guess not.
>>2887189
Why is samurai armor so based though?
>>2888996
Let's get into some Edo period.
>>2886440
Yeah it's pretty gross... It ended after Qing dynasty I think. worst dynasty imo. Another reason why Han dynasty is the best imo
>>2889069
>Continental Celts famous for wearing pants
>Insular Celts famous for not wearing pants
Explain
>>2888879
What's interesting is all the hairstyles the standard topknot displaced.
>>2889085
Question about Japanese wedding gowns. I assume the explicitly white kimonos are more of a Western addition. I'm wondering about these hats though. Is it an equivalent to a veil?
>>2889122
Han dynasty version
>>2887936
Here. Left it at my work office.
>>2889125
Yeah, it's the equivalent. It's removed at the start of the ceremony, and under it she wears another hat, supposed to hide the bride's "horns of jealousy". You're also right that the all white kimonos were a Western influence, but brides generally wear very colorful and intricately decorated kimonos over it, often that has been in the family for generations.
Sorry I'm on mobile so I don't have pictures.
>>2889039
It is indeed incredibly aesthetic.
>>2889405
It's fine, I think I got it. Pic related. It makes sense. Even in Europe and Western traditions, the tradition of the bride wearing all white didn't surface until later(I think 18th century?)
And "horns of jealousy?" Explain. Do you mean the bride was jokingly assumed to be jealous while she was getting married ? That's certainly interesting.
>>2886258
That is so fucking cute
Can someone post some late Roman /fa/shion?
>>2887757
Bare tits.
More of a hope than an expectation desu senpai. That said, it comes and goes throughout history.
>>2887090
>>2889704
Some examples of drawings I did years ago.
>>2889715
>>2889717
>>2889720
This ones more recent.
>>2889726
Maya women headwear and hairstyles of the 6th-9th centuries.
>>2889732
The whole set.
>>2886246
Phoneposter posters like you should be banned for shitting up the board
Bronze age Sardinia (Nuragic Civilization).
>>2888054
>>2889763
>>2889763
love Sardinians
>tfw women will not dress like this again
>>2889774
Russian hat variations
>>2889791
Nice, thank you! I didn't had this image, I was going to post all the pics one by one, I guess it's not necessary anymore. Anyway, this is a way more recent dress (some old ladies still use it daily).
>>2889354
>Used sponges as contraceptives.
How?
Another thing, what were they possibly shaving off of 14 y/o boys? Long hair?
>>2889824
A dress from another town (every town had a different traditional dress).
>>2889850
>>2889854
>>2889857
>>2889845
>Another thing, what were they possibly shaving off of 14 y/o boys? Long hair?
gook detected
>he didn't have a full grown manly beard by the time he was 14
kek
>>2889804
Yea I drew them a while back (started in 2011), but the hairstyles are more recent from the last 3 years.
>>2889879
Cool! Tell me if you need other ones, I have some images more zoomed on the faces (this is Orgosolo's dress, btw, the skirt is not visible here but it's pretty cool too).
>>2887294
Me too but I'm just fascinated with how one male progenitor can spawn a line that lasts a thousand years.
>>2889891
Would you happen to know what the mens hairstyles were like? In the Osprey pic it seems one had braids. Also yea some zoomed faces would be nice.
>>2889923
The only ones I know, (according to the Giants of Mont'e Prama and some bronze statuettes I've seen, so maybe I missed something) are braids (pic related, I can post an image of a reconstruction of the statue where you can see the braids better, if you need it) and short hair.
Ok, I will post them now then. Btw, are you going to post your drawings here on /his/? I would love to see them when they're done.
>>2890008
>>2889923
Also, some of them had beards.
>>2889923
>>2887757
Longer tunic-like shirts for men, capes and hoods for women
>>2886224
What book that is from?
>>2890021
>>2890036
I will post some guys as well, later.
>>2890048
>>2890050
>>2890052
>>2890055
>>2889864
>tfw didn't grow facial hair until 18
>>2890056
FUGG image limit reached. I will reverse search the pics and post the links.
>>2890067
http://www.panecirco.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ragazza-sarda.jpg
>>2889655
>>2889655
The kimono in the picture you posted actually quite representative because it has a crane motif: as cranes choose a mate for life, they are very common as decoration for these bridal kimonos, called "uchikake".
The hat under the veil is called "tsunokakushi", with "tsuno" meaning horns and "kakushi" meaning hidden. It was meant to hide the woman's bad side, the metaphorical demon horns, what made her jealous, selfish, from the groom's family. So the actual veil is just like the Christian tradition, representing modesty, virginity, but they add another layer, the hat, that's supposed to represent the bride's commitment to becoming a good wife. It isn't supposed to be removed for the whole ceremony and the festivities after.
I'm assuming it's a kinda tongue-in-cheek tradition, yeah. But it's rooted in Shinto traditions, where these demons/ogres ("oni") are considered just as real as the other monsters and spirits, so I guess I don't really know.
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5304/5676019575_07c8d28a55_z.jpg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/reflexpicture/4033475373/sizes/l
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pedr078/12517211093/in/gallery-gianfry-58-72157636580400436/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/frankieem/6058698553/in/gallery-gianfry-58-72157636580400436/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lampis_pier_paolo/3491842505/in/gallery-gianfry-58-72157636580400436/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pierbach/17430470481/in/gallery-gianfry-58-72157636580400436/
http://www.panecirco.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ragazza-sarda.jpg
>>2890074
Now some of the guys:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/fa/a9/e6/faa9e6e82fa54a15ea24e6c2e1aa92a2.jpg
http://files1.sardegna-images.com/images/web_550x413/11/11480_sardinian_costumes.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/06/6f/e8/066fe8699d9a5f2bc0ee79863e10dba9.jpg
http://www.provincia.mediocampidano.it/resources/cms/images/20091217_uomo_in_costume_sardo_d0.JPG
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/--tO7n4bAQu4/UxUPFVeJITI/AAAAAAAAFBM/NYkX5QHbJvY/s1600/macomer+%25283%2529.jpg
http://www.costaorientale.it/public/editorfiles/image/06Apr08_297_300(1).jpg
>>2890074
damn shes cute, would look good in a "minoan dress".
>>2890105
Oh yes she would.
>>2890102
This is the image of the braids from the statues:
http://www.amsicora.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/gigante_monte_prama2.jpg
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-aCHQb_G5qAg/VIZ8QD3DZuI/AAAAAAAAJiE/JtsaaC7JGro/s1600/Immagine.jpg
Let me know if you need other picture of faces or other stuff, or if those are enough.
This is a really good thread, we need more of them
Maybe make a new one soon due to image cap
Are you female then? If so then contact deets pls for cool /his/torical convos
All of my favourite historical societies have little to no artistic depictions
How do I learn to draw
>>2890139
I think this should be good thanks. Would you know what the interiors of the nuragic structures looked like? Or a typical home?
>>2886784
Sexy, very sexy.
>>2889864
What? I'm not first off . Second, plenty of men didn't grow beard until near the end of highschool. Are you serious? Unless they went through puberty super early. Hairy Indian/ Scandinavian detected.
>>2890209
Drawabox.com
Loomis
>>2890101
Thanks so much anon!
Good thread.
>>2890029
ISBN 0-439-68681-4
>>2889676
Are there not enough already?
I would post more but we reached image limit. If you wanna make another thread maybe to continue? You can also just look at Pinterest for more. I assume late republic period was 50 B.C to 20A.D?
https://www.pinterest.com/search/pins/?q=roman%20republic%20fashion&rs=typed&term_meta[]=roman%7Ctyped&term_meta[]=republic%7Ctyped&term_meta[]=fashion%7Ctyped
They always have some good stuffit if you search well
>>2890250
You mean the structure or the furniture?
>>2889845
they put them in the vagina to prevent semen from reaching the uterus. Haven't you ever seen the Seinfeld episode about it? Similar concept to an IUD i believe except put in and removed prior to and after sex. There was also an herb that the romans used to make a morning after drug, but they had so much sex the plant went extinct.
>>2890456
Both I suppose
>>2890209
>Take figure drawing courses or live model events.
>Practice drawing from life/observation every day.
>learn basic perspective and anatomy.
>don't use black paint to shade everything.
>learn composition
>>2889741
¿What's wrong with phoneposting?
>>2889824
>>2889850
>>2889854
>>2889859
These are all pretty /fa/, but as far as each town historically having a different dress, some of these look pretty impractica;. I get wearing them in photos like these, when people are trying to show off their historical dress, but as far as being historical peasant costumes, how did women actually do any work in them? Was every-day wear a simpler version without some of the frills, while still being recognizably the same general outfit? That's what I have to assume, but am I wrong?
>>2890598
Not certain about this
Even though the clothes look complex, their aren't many components to actually put on or off which shouldn't take too long, if they aren't perfectionists it should take about 10-15 minutes to get dressed at most.
For usual work excluding stuff where they are on the floor/farming, it shouldn't get in the way, and if it does the clothes can be changed to simpler things which might be made especially for dirty/dangerous work.
>>2890489
- Nuraghes (now):
http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/4281393.jpg
http://photos.wikimapia.org/p/00/02/15/11/58_big.jpg
http://www.labarbagia.net/archivi/immagini/2015/I/interno-nuraghe-ola.jpg
https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/08/ad/d6/e5/cortile-interno.jpg
http://photos.wikimapia.org/p/00/00/52/05/75_big.jpg
http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/15029376.jpg
http://www.tgtourism.tv/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Barumini.jpg
https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/08/ad/d6/e5/cortile-interno.jpg
- Nuraghes (reconstruction):
http://www.alghero.org/main/images/BARUMINI_COMPLETO.JPG
- Houses (reconstruction):
http://www.shardanamistery.com/img/did_p2_i3.png
http://web.tiscali.it/iscolaponte/Immagini/archelogia2_file/image012.jpg
There were also more complex one (with separated rooms with openings on a courtyard and even some ovens for bread), and someone also thinks some of those could have been covered by the same stone "tholos" of the nuraghes.
I don't know much about the furniture, only that probably the food was put inside pots that were after put under the pavement level and covered by a stone slab.
Other structures:
-Temples (only recent photos, I couldn't find anything else right now):
http://www.casavacanzesardegna.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Tempio-Nuragico-S%E2%80%99Arcu-%E2%80%98e-Is-Forros.jpg
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tempio_nuragico_megaron.png
-Sacred well (santa Cristina of Pauli/Paulilatino):
https://sketchfab.com/models/94c11138257f46b4a1be58de651764b8 (look up the other models from this guy, btw)
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/9f/78/98/9f7898bcd1a5ca89ace9203f74cb93e2.jpg
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santuario_nuragico_di_Santa_Cristina
"Meeting huts":
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6Kvzv-GjW14/VmknjB-Ag7I/AAAAAAAAPM4/cUf4aQ0PfKE/s1600/20141221_144407.jpg
Also all the images that you can find here:
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilt%C3%A0_nuragica
>>2887082
I love tight titties
>>2890489
>>2890780
Ok, for today that's all I can find. I'm not at home right now, so maybe tomorrow I will post something else.
>>2890598
what >>2890681 said. Usually they wore that, but of course most of the times with less jewels in everyday life.
https://barbarapicci.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/sardegna-desulo-la-benzinaia-giuseppa-floris-1974-foto-di-mario-de-biasi.jpg
>>2888763
The modern suit is traditional garb for the English. It's just the style has kept evolving for the last 400 years, since Charles II. Sometimes the tails are longer, the fit, etc.
>>2887702
>The negative is how apparently everything characteristic of femininity is some variation of dress up.
Going by this thread, it's not really a negative and was pretty influential/important
>>2888815
that's arminius and his waifu
>>2888045
>but when you realize that for most of history people didn't bath
Simply untrue
>>2886224
4chan has too many roastie posters
>>2888045
Excuse me? Romans at least were extremely hygienic. They took hot baths and used scented oils along with the metal equivalent to a luffa to scrub the dirt and debris off of them everyday, especially if upper class. In most Asian cultures people bathed at least once a day with hot water if upper class. Sure, deodorant wasn't invented yet but at least they had perfume/scented oils after a bath anyway. Medieval Europe, particularly in the high middle ages, did a bit less with every other day if highborn or possibly every few weeks if a peasant. Even then, I'm sure they found ways to bath in the river. French people in the 17th century were just stinky though.
Tl;DR that's a myth for the most part except for the fact that there was no deodorant invented yet.french people kind of stunk.
>>2888864
True with the whole waist coat thing...still they Blazer and suit jacket have not changed since the 1920s. I mean c'mon, can't we get some variety already?
>>2891244
Assuming girl
>Any girl who posts is a roastie.
You keep that up and you will live a sad lonely life my friend.
>>2890458
Lol heard of the later. An IUD is hormonally based so no I wouldn't call it that. You probably mean it's like a female condom only it soaks up the semen? Still sounds highly unsanitary though. I assume Roman women, particularly prostitutes, had problems with frequent UTIs. Getting UTI from intercourse is easy enough normally for a woman. For goodness sake, I hope they at least urinated somewhere right after.
>>2886258
>Went to get adopted brother from orphanage in Vietnam with parents when I was 5
> Crazy place and crazy trip that lasted a couple weeks, but a woman there made me my own traditional outfit.
> It was one of the highlights of the trip. I really loved it until I grew out of it. I even kept it for a while afterwards, because it was so nice.
>Mfw that would be labeled cultural appropriation nowadays, since I'm white.
> Doesn't even matter that my brother doesn't give a single fuck. Doesn't matter that the woman who made it for me or the people that I wore it in front of in Vietnam didn't give a fuck.
Anyways, I love all this fashion crap. Awesome for art reference and general curiosity.
>>2891328
I'm not sure you understand how cultural appropriation works. Asians and Native Americans are ok with you dressing up as them as long as you wear their garbs properly and Cary yourself with respect...it's only black people who for some reason won't even let anyone else wear dreads, braids, etc even if they have black friends and obviously like black people It's pretty dumb I know. I don't agree with it.
>>2890458
IUD's have 2 versions.
One uses the same hormones that a normal pill or patch would.They either thicken the mucus in the cervix to trap the sperm to let it die out, or cause you to stop ovulating.
The other, which has copper in it, repels sperm away from the egg.
>>2887869
untied long hair was often taken as a sign of a prostitute, at least in asia. it's a bed-raggeled look that signifies you just had sex. but it was also a symbolic contrast to pinned up hair styles,as loose hair symbolized indepedence.
>>2889080
it ended as recently as the 1940s.
there are still women around with bound feet.
check out the x-rays, which are slightly more palatable.
In Madagascar the original apparel was loincloths made from beaten bark cloth like taputapu, from there the Swahili traders introduced most clothes and clothing/fashion terms like Lebas from Arabic became Lamba a brocade.
Anyways the Lamba is the basis of Malagasy fashion to this day, turbans were common for a time but lost fashion because of European influence outside of Arab Malagasy communities like Antemoro.
The clothing of Madagascar is a fusion of Swahili and South Indian styles with Southeast Asian techniques. Say an Indian merchant sold a large panel of cotton or silk, they'd turn it back to a long thread and refabricate it with the new style in mind. Europeans introduced the fashions in pic related but again it's modified.
In the lowlands women painted faces in tumeric and clays to protect the face from darkening, both men and women blackened their back teeth (a phrases is "never let strangers see your back molars" meaning don't be too giving of your personal details) and most hair styles were unisex large balls of hair coaxed into shape with fat and beeswax, in braids bundled into balls one of each side of the hair, disks of cooled braids, etc... All unisex.
Our most famed Lambas the Lamba akotifahana is actually part of the great back and forth of influence and alteration. Quite beautiful honestly.
>>2891807
wheres the pic?
>>2891835
Oh image limit was reached
>>2891727
Didn't it signify a criminal, barbarian, or (unmarried) women as well?
>>2891850
Do you have link?
>>2891862
Google "vintage Malgache"
>>2887757
>What in your opinions are some decent looking historical fashion that is likely to make a resurgence, or at least has a possibility to?
I want some historical male accessories to come back, primarily capes and hats.
I'm all for more female toplessness, too, and understand and accept that this would mean seeing topless ugly women.
>>2890429
Thanks a lot
The thread is so good, I don't want it to die
By the way, what is the hood with the long tail usually wonder during the 14th century called in western europe
>>2888238
The Chinese thought mercury was a magic elixir of eternal life, and they have a thriving traditional "medicine" market to this day. People believe retarded shit.
>>2888618
#FreeTheRightNipple
>>2887082
>Veins
Oh thank you. I like seeing some veiny tits means that bitch can produce milk.
>>2889627
I'm delighted that people this edgy exist in the world, and manage to pull it off.
>>2895424
Me too, that's pretty cool.
>>2889874
Nice work, anon.
Lady on the left does look like a pissed-off fetish model though.
>>2889578
>my feeto hurt
>za teppo is too rowd
>thisu kabuto is too taito
>where is honoroable nobuhide-san
>>2886224
I had this exact book as a kid.
NEW THREAD
>>2887757
Fedoras
>>2891307
>An IUD is hormonally based
Not necessarily, I believe there are (or were) IUDs made of copper. Copper is a spermicide.
>300 replies
/his/ has more femanons than I thought.
>>2898211
We're all just fanucs
Anyone know Cambodian or Thai fashion around the middle ages period?
Im going to start wearing a chiton to the beach. I live in socal and since it's so hot plus since anything feminine is pretty normal here I should be fine. I think I totally could rock it. The question is how can i add that splash to make it modern
>>2898764
Give it a contemporary pattern or texture like denim.
>>2898982
Bruh what? Texture like denim? Patterns are super girly. Like waaay too girly
>>2887472
Blah blah blah what a bore
>>2899009
>Breh you mean
A chiton made of denim fabric like this:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/73/e8/c6/73e8c6f2f0159082c3c8622792f4acb6.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/94/85/e5/9485e5f5e5fdb1ecf25f7c6e4408ebbb.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/a3/e0/b5/a3e0b50a493826fc1b1e89a727c554cb.jpg
>>2899024
Ahh that doesnt look so bad but definitely not my style. Thansk though
>>2886297
They are the masterrace, unironically.
>>2887927
Is /pol/ right after all?
>>2900064
What the hell are you talking about now you autist? Middle easterners in general are quite hot actually. And you DO know that not all middle easterners are Muslim...you idiot. I stand by my statement.
Geez why are you polcucks so insecure?
>>2896851
I guess we could do that. Not sure if it's proper to make generals on this board though.