I recently made a DNA test. My father was from Sierra Leone and

Stop making this thread.
And you are a cuck and a faggot for giving your DNA to a corporation.

File: doubt.png (29KB, 300x162px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 300x162px

>>2850736
Stop making this thread asshole.

Also

>father is black
>knowing who your father is

>>2850755

Never have I ever received a proper answer here. I shall continue my quest for my long lost family, despite how many threads I will be obliged to make more.

>>2850781

I'll stop when I've found out about my ancestor's possible history. That joke was funny the last time you posted it, as it was know. I hope you'll be present during my possible next thread, unless I find my catharsis on the subject tonight.

>>2850907
OP there is a margin of error on those tests you should consider. These small traces may in fact be false positives.

those tests don't work the way the companies claim they do.

i wouldn't worry too much about those results they are likely inaccurate anyway.

>>2850916
>>2850923

Tell me more about this. Isn't it because some companies test for, let's say, your family of 500 years whereas some companies go as far as 200 000 years, resulting in completely uneven results?

>>2850736
Was Sierra Leone a settlement for ex slaves like Liberia so somewhere along the line someone must have inherited Amerindian and Oceanic DNA from the colonies.

>>2851426
*Sierra Leone was

>>2850736
>1%

Literally noise

>>2851426
>>2851429
>>2851594

I also had 22% undefined West African. That might mean that I'm Liberian, maybe Guinean, etc. Perhaps the Amazonian and Papuan don't come from Sierra Leone or Nigeria, but somewhere else?

Bumpety.

flying niggers.

well ssheeeet

>>2850736
I am sorry to kill your dream, but 1% is probably just some ground noise, a statistical error into which it is not even worth looking

>>2850736
Those were the so called trace amounts? Even the company says that you shouldn't take those for facts