>colonies on all continents >own's 20% of the worlds

>>2848337
It's where the 'history is written by the victors' meme is truest.

File: 1490796573420.jpg (14KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 251x242px

>nazis complaining about war crimes and saying the allies started the war

>>2848358
Well if count USSR as part of the same group as western allies then both sides were equal as both Germany and USSR started WWII.

But I don't do that. The Soviets had their own plans separate from Great Britain/US and never fought a battle together and joined sides with liberal democracies because they had the common enemy.

>>2848337
It's debatable just how culpable the British were for the famines in India, and insofar as they were culpable, the famines were caused by administrative incompetence and not malice. That doesn't make it all A-OK, but it's a long way from deliberate genocide.

The Nazis set up death camps and deliberately murdered millions of people for basically no fucking reason.

So yeah, there's a slight difference.

>>2848358
not even a nazi, just tired off the bullshit that one side was worse then the other, beside the Germans wouldn't even had commited that many war crimes if the brits never went to war with them in the first place (no holocaust, operation Barbarossa etc)

>>2848337
pretty sure there would be no trial if nazis won

>>2848375
>the British were responsible for the holocaust and Operation Barbarossa
hhhhhhhhhhhhh

>>2848375
what?
Brits forced Germany to invade Soviet Union?

That picture's dumb.

I'm pretty sure Churchill didn't speak German so I don't know why he wouldn't be wearing a headset.

>>2848375
>>the Brits were responsible for the Holocaust and Operation Barbarossa
holy shit /pol/int/ has really been huffing some fucking dank memes

>>2848388

Obviously, it's Britains fault that we didn't defeat them first.

Germany is not responsible for it's own actions.

>>2848375

>>>/pol/

>>>/r/the_donald

Btw Nuremberg was a scam. If anything they should've been tried in Switzerland or Sweden.
Also Soviets tried to shift the blame entirely on Germans.

File: anglo.png (29KB, 550x690px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 550x690px

>>2848382
>>2848388
>>2848403
>brits where responsible for the holocaust and operation Barbarossa
that's not what i said niggers,
what i said is that if the Brits didn't declare war on the Germans (The Brits obviously didn't do it for humanitarian reasons)
shit wouldn't have got as bad as it did.
The Brits however where responsible for alot of other shit that happend outside of Europe

>>2848375

>"Im not a nazi!"

>proceeds to shill retarded stormfag revisionist history and propaganda

wow, this totally tricked me!

>>2848439

thats retarded though and doesnt make any sense whatsoever.

>>2848337

>he thinks declaring war is starting the war

File: XsyJSE5.png (41KB, 171x189px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 171x189px

>>2848439
I know this is a troll post but I still got to give you a (you)
>If I just leave the expansionist power alone they'll just get tried and stop taking over

>>2848439
>reeeeee how dare you honor your agreements and alliances

Pure autism

>>2848437

If Nuremberg was a scam and they were just out to make heads roll, then how come some people on trial were found innocent and let go? Or found not guilty of everything they were charged with and got really reduced sentences?

>>2848439
so you are saying, if Bris didn't declare war on Germany, then Hitler wouldn't have invaded Soviet Union?
I think the opposite is true, Operation Barbossa would come much sooner

>>2848475
to make it look more belivable
seems like it worked

File: das rite.jpg (42KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x500px

>>2848464
It was the Brits who declared the war tho, they only used Poland as an excuse
>>2848465
the Germans had no interest expanding too the west

>>2848475

It's almost like stormcunt accounts of what happened aMr here are significantly more conspiracy theory than historical fact and is done so with a deliberate agenda to blacken the Allies.

>>2848483

And declaring war is not starting the war.

>>2848483
>honoring a defensive pact is an "excuse"

Go home /pol/

File: churchill.jpg (430KB, 1503x2200px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 1503x2200px

>>2848497
for what reason do you think they even entered a defensive pact with Poland, and why didn't they declare war on the Soviets for doing the same shit?

>>2848377
There would be but they would end with Churchill, Chamberlain, FDR and Stalin being hung from barbed wire and beaten.

>>2848511

Because the Soviets hadn't done it a number of times already.

File: 1438559177915.jpg (142KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 500x375px

>>2848483
>the Germans had no interest expanding too the west
No one can be this retarded, Nazi ideology specifically calls for the creation of a pan-European union for all Germanic-Nordic peoples. Hitler's original plan could have very well been one of subterfuge and corrosion rather than armed conflict but it still entails conquering other sovereign nations

>>2848517
>what is the finnish winter war
>what is the annexation of the baltics post-ww2

>>2848534

>post WW2

Anon, I...

File: NEW ORDER.jpg (726KB, 3922x2559px) Image search: [Google]

726KB, 3922x2559px

reminder that this was the nazi New Order planned to happen after they won the war

File: patton.jpg (33KB, 342x256px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 342x256px

>>2848537
if they weren't hypocrites they would have declared on the soviets too when Stalin started his bullshit post ww2.
He didn't gain nukes anyways until 1949

>>2848511
>for what reason do you think they even entered a defensive pact

To try and stop Germany from killing Poland.

>why didn't they declare war on the Soviets

Because they weren't suicidal.

Germany knew that the Western allies were going to declare war. That was the whole point you little fool.

>>2848546
At least the map didn't do that retarded shit where the Mediterranean is the colour of Italy an a giant blob

>>2848546
>nazis still occupying north France
>nazis owning romania and Hungary
nice meme

>>2848548

>hey guys, we know you're exhausted and pushed to your limits with many of your friends and family dead or crippled, but we need to keep fighting! Against the people we have been arming and supplying this time!

>>2848559
Don't forget that Churchill DID want to open hostilities against the Soviets, and was essentially stonewalled by the Americans.

>>2848415
>>2848457
Why do you leftist snowflakes want a SJW safespace?

>>2848563
>anglo wants to backstab his allies
why aren't I suprized?

>>2848570

>30 seconds ago the Anglos were evil for NOT attacking the Soviets

Make up your minds people.

File: C09.jpg (54KB, 477x724px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 477x724px

>>2848337

As someone that's totally ignorant about WW1, I'd like to ask three things I've seen flying recently from /pol/ people:

1. Is it true that the British had a smear campaign against the Germans that was outright false in every way? That they insisted Germans speared babies and cut the hands of little boys, and that it all turned out to be fake.

2. I see that /pol/ people keep saying that Germany was "forced" to enter through Belgium in order to knock out the French first and that it was self-defense and simple preservation. But hadn't they been drawing up plans to do this long before the British declared war on them?

3. How much truth is there to the fact that the British and French just had it in for Germany, and they were looking for reasons to start a war? The theory I see put forth is that they basically allied together because they wanted to see Germany destroyed and brought to disunity once more.

File: 1480862344664.png (82KB, 850x1049px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 850x1049px

>>2848568

>if you dont believe in retarded stormfag made up history it means you are an SJW!

>>2848579
>hadn't they been drawing up plans to do this long before the British declared war on them?
lot's of nations tend to have war plans if shit hit the fan. Americans had plans on how to invade Canada in the most efficient way if they would go to war with the commonwealth,
even tho it was extremely unlikely

>>2848579
1. Some actions committed by Germans in Belgium were exaggerated for the sake of propaganda such as impailing multiple children on bayonets

2. Not necessarily, going through Margiot Line was always an option but it was heavily defended. Germany went through Belgium believieing it would be a pushover and they would simply march through and then move onwards to France

3. Both Entente and Central Powers all had it out for each other and questionable goals. Germany, especially because of Wilhelm, alienated itself from France and Britain with its aggression and stupid policy making especially since the enemy was always considered Russia. Wilhelm's newspaper interview showed his disapproving views towards Britain, France, Russia and Japan which further isolated Germany from those powers and discouraged much cooperation between them so Germany ended up with two face and Abdul when he could had Pierre, Nigel and Akira spitroasting the Russians.

>>2848579
1. Yes the British had a smear campaign. But so did ever other country. It's called state propaganda and we still use it today.

2. While it's true that the best way to invade France is though Belgium the Schlieffen Plan was first drawn up in 1905. The Germany plan was to knock out France fast in a fashion similar to the Franco Prussian war so British involvement wouldn't have been a factor.

3. While France certainly had it out for Germany (hence why they allied Russia) the British were far more indecisive. Britain and France weren't even allied. It's possible that with a different set of people in Westminster they might have stayed neutral for quite sometime.

>>2848605
Japan were oppurtunist cunts tho, they would have invaded German colonies anyways if they knew they didn't have resourches to take them back

>>2848579

1. Literally every country ever has used propaganda to make the enemy into villians. This is in no way some shocking conspiracy or anything out of bounds so I dont even get what you are trying to imply here. The Germans did the same thing against the British for example. And there was "The Rape of Belgium" which was ampted up in proapganda to show how barbaric and violent the "Huns" were. It started being a thing to notice that it was greatly exaggerated for propaganda, but recent historians found out it wasnt that exaggerated at all.

2. The Plan used was "The Schlieffen Plan" which was written up in 1905

3. Sort of right, but this is a really muddy issue. The whole problem was that there was an arms race in Europe during the early 1900s, which caused tensions among all the major powers in Europe. Everyone distrusted everyone and then when the Duke was assassinated, it set off a powder keg of intertwined alliances. France at the time was the big swinging dick of mainland Europe though.

>>2848605
>>2848606
>>2848600

Thank you, my lords. But what I'm asking as far as (1) goes is whether or not the British smear campaign was legendary in a way that forever changed the perception of Germans from highly-civilized and peace-loving people into mongrel dogs akin to Uruk-Hai. And whether it was all made up, or just exaggerated for effect. Because in /pol/ writings it's presented as if the British went far and beyond with the campaign (supposedly because they were financed by Jews that controlled the media and had relations in British aristocracy).

>>2848605

Where can I find that interview? And why was he pursuing such a dangerous course of action? Did he not see losing everything as an option?

>>2848614

> but recent historians found out it wasnt that exaggerated at all

Where can I read about that?

>>2848579
>1. Is it true that the British had a smear campaign against the Germans that was outright false in every way? That they insisted Germans speared babies and cut the hands of little boys, and that it all turned out to be fake.
Yes and every nation at the time did similar things to dehumanize their foes.

>2. I see that /pol/ people keep saying that Germany was "forced" to enter through Belgium in order to knock out the French first and that it was self-defense and simple preservation. But hadn't they been drawing up plans to do this long before the British declared war on them?
Germany, Austria, France, the United Kingdom, and Russia all signed the first treaty of London which guaranteed the neutrality and independence of Belgium, and Luxembourg. The British also warned Germany that invading Belgium meant war with them prior to the invasion.

>3. How much truth is there to the fact that the British and French just had it in for Germany, and they were looking for reasons to start a war? The theory I see put forth is that they basically allied together because they wanted to see Germany destroyed and brought to disunity once more.
France yes, Britain no, it was in Britains interest for France to not lose the war so the balance of power was maintained on the continent, but they had no interest in fighting on Frances behalf, but declared war on Germany only after they refused the ultimatum to leave Belgium and cease hostilities against the neutral power.

>>2848623
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=10090

>>2848623
Sorry for mobile link but here's stuff about the interview
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Telegraph_Affair

Wilhelm pursued a dangerous course of action because he was depressed and anxiety ridden idiot who should have been left to play grab ass on his yacht and rant about Japs sending Buddhism to Europe like he used to do before the war

>>2848337

>Using your reply to another thread to create a new one
You should be gassed.

>>2848631
>>2848635

Thank you both.

File: 1487447107310.jpg (145KB, 468x420px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 468x420px

>>2848337
>>were the ones starting the war

>sure, we'll look the other way while you re-arm
>sure, we'll look the other way while you re-militarize the rhineland
>sure, we'll look the other way while you annex austria
>sure, we'll look the other way while you dismember our ally

Clearly, ((((((((((Britain)))))))))) was hell-bent on war with Germany.
I really feel so bad for Chamberlain, he worked with Hitler in good faith, all logic and good sense was with him, who could want another war just 20 years after the war? Everyone knew how horrible war is but (((Hitler))) couldn't be reasoned with and he had to destroy Europe, costing millions of lives and ruining nationalism for all future generations.

>>2848570
Liberal democracies had a temporary team up with the Soviets. It's not like they were actually best friends. USSR still started the war together with Germany so betraying them wouldn't damage their honor. Would actually restore it.

>>2848654

>I really feel so bad for Chamberlain

Me too. Especially since he's now a bad guy when that warmongering piece of shit Churchill is considered a (((((hero))))).

>>2848659
>backstabbing their ally of last 5 years without a declaration of war or any causus belli wouldn't damage their honor.
of course not, since anglos have no honor left

>>2848680

>litterally just gone to war, had its men killed and cities destroyed for honor

>>2848679
How was Churchill a warmonger?

>>2848680
Aggressors don't deserve loyalty.

>>2848679
Chamberlain was spineless and the reason things got out of hand.

>>2848579
Regarding 1 they claimed the French town that was massacred and burned by the nazis also was full of children and fetuses that were crucified. It's true the town burned down and the people died but no crucifixions were ever found.

>>2848709
and agressor is whoever the anglo doesn't like?

>>2848729
Whoever starts the war of aggression like Germany and their allies Soviet Union Allying with either of them would be shameful so by attacking them the Brits would be clean.

>>2848439
>WW2 wouldn't have started if the Brits didn't declare war on Germany
One coupon for one free dolphin therapy session was sent to your hone address.

Why is it that every neonazi or /pol/tard makes outright idiotic statements and goes full retard after being called out?

>>2848760

Because they're used to an echo chamber circle jerk, so don't know how to respond to disagreement.

>>2848337
>evil
>>>/pol/

File: A_Wyatt_Mann_Serves_Him_Right_He_Trusted_A_Kraut.jpg (167KB, 700x776px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 700x776px

>>2848654
>>2848679

>>2848568
>if you don't support socialism you're a leftist
back to Stormfront you fucking retard

>>2848511
>and why didn't they declare war on the Soviets for doing the same shit?
Because the Soviet pretext was a legitimate one. They were moving into areas with Belorussians and Ukrainians and the policy of the Allies post-Versailles was one of ethnic unity.

>>2848776
no, they still do it on /pol/ too
>argue with a nazi about politics
>he tries arguing that somehow seizing the means of production and redistributing the wealth of the capitalist class is right wing as long as you talk shit about Marx and Lenin while doing it
>point out how blatantly fucking stupid that is
>he stops responding to me and spams "info"graphics about how Hitler dindu nuffin
mysticism is a hell of a drug

>>2848371
Is it because the staple crops in India was replaced by cash crops and other profitable industries?

>>2848836

stormfags are just kids playing cowboys and indians. They only hate communism in the first place because their childish mindset NEEDS a bad guy to fight against, and they fill that with communism.

>>2848596
>everything that's not my anti white Leftypol propaganda is stormfront
You Leftypol shills are so pathetic
>>2848821
/his/ isn't your safespace, SJW

>>2848842
You're saying people trying to make money to feed there family gives them responsibility to feed the people in the nation? If I am a farm and the British want to buy a cash crop for a better price than me selling rice I should still just do rice for the goos of the country? There is a reason Indians are basically slave labor even today if they aren't forced to farm what you want the country will starve. The population is out of control and always has.

>>2848924
Just like how you leftists need to vilify white people and any else who doesn't agree with your SJW shit

>>2848511
>if they declared more wars they wouldn't be aggressors
/pol/tard logic

>>2848924
same shit can be said about your shitpost kike apologist

>>2848959
they shouldn't be declaring wars if they aren't going to finish them

>>2848950
>>2848976
thanks for proving my point dumb dicks

File: 1453912253118.jpg (26KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 480x360px

>>2849098
> dumb dicks
what kind of a fucking insult is that

File: image.jpg (67KB, 736x572px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 736x572px

>>2848337
germany dindu nuffin

dey wuz good volks

>>2848938

No one is getting triggered because of conflicting ideologies. It's because you're a fucking mouth breather with the critical thinking skills of a rock, even still after getting reminded multiple times that it has nothing to do with politics and moreso with the fact that /pol/fags think they're experts qualified to speak on every subject while the majority probably have legit learning disabilities.

File: 1476329345246.jpg (47KB, 435x592px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 435x592px

>>2848938
>You Leftypol shills are so pathetic

you are literally shilling nazism you stupid faggot, so you obviously cant turn that shit around. And no one is "tiggered" we are annoyed because you post the SAME EXACT shit over and over and over and over again despite the fact that we constantly answer all your "just asking questions!" totally not shill post. You faggots think that if you stubbornly throw this shit at a wall, it will eventually stick. You arent going to convert a bunch of history buffs to your retarded ideology based entirely around made up revisionist history dumbass. You are the creationist of history

>>2848337
>were the ones starting the war
So they should just have let Germany invade Poland without any repercussions?

File: just fuck my empire up.png (730KB, 1606x800px) Image search: [Google]

730KB, 1606x800px

>>2849221
yes, why the fuck should they care about Poland?
Besides their victory was phunic, they lost their empire and became a vassal to America,
b-but atleast Germany didn't get poland guys

>>2849260
*Pyrrhic

>>2849260
>why should they care about a powerful, industrialized, country in Europe annexing everyone around them

Fixed that for you.

>>2848527
> Hitler's original plan could have very well been one of subterfuge and corrosion rather than armed conflict
This is absolutely not the case. Hitler's ideology was one of militarism from the very beginning, because aggressively pillaging foreign countries is the only way the Nazis could pay off their massive domestic debt.

That's why they beelined for the gold reserves of whichever country they conquered, and why afterward they did anything possible to extract wealth and bring it back to Germany. Otherwise they would have defaulted and the entire regime would have crumbled.

>>2849275
more like took back parts that previously belonged to them or had a german majority,

>>2848579
About WWI German occupation in Belgium and France.

https://www.armstrong.edu/history-journal/history-journal-the-forgotten-victims-of-the-north-french-civilians-under-g

http://www.remembrancetrails-northernfrance.com/history/the-department-of-nord-and-the-coal-basin-under-german-occupation/forced-labour-hostages-and-deportees.html

>>2849284
>France
>Luxembourg
>Poland
>Belgium
>Netherlands
>Norway
>Yugoslavia
>Greece
>the entire fucking USSR west of the Urals
>"""German majority"""

>>2849260
where would Germany look after Poland? Conflict with England, France and the USSR was inevitable

>>2849338
>>France
declared war on Germany
>>Luxembourg
German
>>Poland
Didn't hand over the rightfuly German parts of the country
>>Belgium
strategically necessary to get into France.
The allies would have invaded neutral countries too if strategically necessary
>>Netherlands
same as before
>>Norway
so that the allies wouldn't beat them to it
>>Yugoslavia
pro-allies coup detat
>>Greece
Mussolini was a retard
Most off these wars wouldn't have happend if the allies didn't declare war, and when it comes to the USSR the Brit's wanted to take them out too

>>2849356
>where would Germany look after Poland
east

>>2848546
Germany would have given some of the rusky land to the deserving fins

>>2849189
How come you don't realize that is literally just one retard spouting nonsense to get (You)s and that he doesn't actually care about the subject?
Oh I get it, you are that guy and you're just baiting and false-flagging, right?

File: 1490900462290.png (96KB, 702x485px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 702x485px

>>2848337

>>2849365
>bully and intimidate several neighbors into being annexed by you
>international community looks the other way for the sake of peace
>you just keep fucking doing it
>international community says "enough is enough"
>HMPH
>just outright invade your neighbor, other countries help it against you
>WAHHHH THEY DECLARED WAR ON ME
>your armies which are equipped and trained specifically for lightning offensive war and positioned on the borders of neighboring countries conquer an entire continent in "self-defense"
>go even further and break a non-aggression pact with an ally who helped finance your earlier conquests and launch the largest military operation in human history
>pay off your massive domestic debt with loot from your conquests
>still continue to play the victim
Brilliant.

>>2849381
>atrocities against non-europeans by europeans are only important when my enemies do it

>>2849381
Just because Anglos and Frogs are shit doesn't mean Germans aren't shit as well.
Also
>Herero and Namaqua genocide
In4 niggurzzz

>>2849402
>Just because Anglos and Frogs are shit doesn't mean Germans aren't shit as well
whole point op made was that the allies where equally bad as the axis

>>2849415
The thing is that fascist apologists like OP would defend the concepts of imperialism, colonialism, even genocide so long as it's being done by "superiors" against "inferiors". In any other context he would think that the UK and France conquering large swathes of Africa and Asia was a GOOD thing, but in this conversation he suddenly starts arguing from a liberal perspective decrying it as evil and aggressive.

>>2849424
i'm OP and no i wouldn't, but if it weren't for the whole genocide thing i'd gladly say nazi germany was the lesser evil

>>2848579

1. Yes, anti-German propaganda was quite strong.

2. Going through Belgium was the easier way, but that doesn't really excuse things for the Germans. Belgium was neutral, and they have violated its status.

3. France was definitely looking for a war to take back the territories lost in 1870.
Britain was interested in settling things with Germany, but the Germans were overconfident and rejected their offers.

>>2849434
>totalitarian regime
>military as the centerpiece of the state
>reliant on foreign conquest to sustain itself
>ideology of racial/ethnic superiority which explicitly calls for said conquest
>large and influential internal propaganda machine constantly attempting to justify said conquest with said ideology
>repeatedly breaks treaties it signs to the point where diplomacy is simply not a viable option when dealing with it
>basically imperialistic capitalism taken to its most extreme degree
>"lesser evil" compared to garden-variety imperialist capitalism which, while rapacious, is at least moderated by christian and enlightenment sensibilities

STOP BULLING BRITAIN

>>2848337
and never forget they inventend piratery and narcotraffic.

>>2849474
>>totalitarian regime
>>military as the centerpiece of the state
nothing wrong with this
>>reliant on foreign conquest to sustain itself
their economy would had changed eventually

>>2849540
>nothing wrong with this
Other than the fact that it led to the largest and most destructive conflict in human history? And that it enabled the other horrible things in my post which you didn't reply to?

>their economy would had changed eventually
If by "change" you mean "utterly collapsed" I believe you're right.

File: 4QPEQpK.png (747KB, 1020x746px) Image search: [Google]

747KB, 1020x746px

The main difference between us and Germany was that we were good at it.

>>2848842
No, because the japs invaded Burma at the same time as the Battle of the Atlantic + Churchill being a cunt

>>2848337
The British had made numerous peace overtures with the Germans involving generous colony transfers to Germany on the condition that they stop any expansion through Eastern Europe. Colonies run abroad were not seen as morally equivalent to annexing sovereign European nations: the primacy and advantage of Europe had to be defended at all costs. It was only the Germans among the Western powers who didn't agree. It's really quite ironic given the people who end up attracted to Nazism in retrospect.

>>2849434

>if it weren't for the whole genocide thing i'd gladly say nazi germany was the lesser evil
>if it weren't for the whole slavery thing i'd gladly say that the confederacy was the lesser evil
>if not for the whole murder thing i'd gladly say that Charles Manson was the lesser evil
>if not for the whole pyramid scheme thing i'd gladly say that Bernie Madoff was the lesser evil
>if not for the whole terrorism thing i'd gladly say that Osama bin Laden was the lesser evil

File: 71iC9F8PfsL._SL1255_.jpg (241KB, 1255x1117px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 1255x1117px

>>2848337

>Build your entire ideology around concepts like "might makes right", "compassion is a Jewish lie", "mercy is for the weak"
>Mock pacifists and publicly shame anybody who doesn't want another war
>Persecute Jews who fought for Germany in the previous war

>Start another war
>Lose another war

>WHAAAAAAAAAA why aren't you being more understanding?

File: Nuffin.jpg (71KB, 600x685px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 600x685px

Was Hitler a Nigger?

>>2848546
>Japan only has its pre Ichi-go holdings in China

k

>>2848343
>>2848343
>>2848343
Most international print and mass-media comes from UK and U.S.

>>2848337
you also forgot british bankers lieterally funding Hitler way into the Reistag

>>2850247

stormfag get out

>>2848337
Whoever created that image is pathetic

>>2848836
>he tries arguing that somehow seizing the means of production and redistributing the wealth of the capitalist class is right wing as long as you talk shit about Marx and Lenin while doing it

To be fair many people still call Ernst Rohm and Strasser right-wing despite agreeing with this.

>>2848836
their still right wing since they believe in hierarchies

>>2849649
Yeah... British were very good at it, mate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKVu9urKyoA&t=1534s&list=FLw6PgPAS48GWuSuvMY5WKzw&index=1

>>2852886
Didn't watch the vid but there's a great board that might be interested in it
>>>/pol/

>>2848370
>Well if count USSR as part of the same group as western allies then both sides were equal as both Germany and USSR started WWII.

This much delusion should not be compatible with the ability to write down text.

>>2848370
The USSR was fighting Japan when Germany invaded Poland.
Soviets only invaded Poland after they had defeated Japan, which took a while.
Basically Germany was half done conquering Poland when the USSR declared war, and it most definitely didn't start WWII like you claim.

>>2848402
Because he didn't care what was being said and was only there for blood.

>>2852941
USSR invaded Poland without a fight (Polish forces were fighting Germs). It was in Ribbentrop-Molotov treaty to partition Poland. USSR never declared war.

>>2853124
We have the complete text of the declaration of war, which was mailed and spoken on the radio.

>Warsaw, as the capital of Poland, no longer exists. The Polish Government has disintegrated, and no longer shows any sign of life. This means that the Polish State and its Government have, in point of fact, ceased to exist. In the same way, the Agreements concluded between the U.S.S.R. and Poland have ceased to operate. Left to her own devices and bereft of leadership, Poland has become a suitable field for all manner of hazards and surprises, which may constitute a threat to the U.S.S.R. For these reasons the Soviet Government, who has hitherto been neutral, cannot any longer preserve a neutral attitude towards these facts. In these circumstances, the Soviet Government have directed the High Command of the Red Army to order troops to cross the frontier and to take under their protection the life and property of the population of Western Ukraine and Western White Russia.

Just because it doesn't specifically say "we declare war" doesn't mean it wasn't a declaration of war. It is clearly stated, and was sent and aired before the actual invasion of the soldiers. Polish were aware of the incoming invasion and tried to maneuver their retreat accordingly, and form a defensive line in that direction as well.

>>2848358
War of European Aggression 2

>>2848337
>>colonies on all continents

So?

>>own's 20% of the worlds landmass

So?

>>responsible for countless of genocides

Wrong, Britain is not responsible for any genocides.

>>mass starvation in India

Not Britain's fault.

>>were the ones starting the war

Objectively wrong.

>>2848371
>the famines were caused by administrative incompetence and not malice
>not malice

>Churchill was totally remorseless in diverting food to the British troops and Greek civilians. To him, “the starvation of anyhow underfed Bengalis (was) less serious than sturdy Greeks”, a sentiment with which Secretary of State for India and Burma, Leopold Amery, concurred.
>Amery was an arch-colonialist and yet he denounced Churchill’s “Hitler-like attitude”. Urgently beseeched by Amery and the then Viceroy Archibald Wavell to release food stocks for India, Churchill responded with a telegram asking why Gandhi hadn’t died yet.

>>2853687

There is a huge difference in doing something like that compared to herding millions of people into slave camps and deliberately starving them.

>>2849365
Gosh, another "Danzig ist deutch" meme
>Slavic Pomeranians settle a port in 9th century
>They agree to join Poland
>Teutonic knights brought by Poland to fight pagans backstab Poles and steal the port in 1307
>Poles regain it after the war with Teutonics in 1466, yet they let German settlers stay
>Teutonics, now Prussians steal the port again in 1793
>After ww1 Allies decide to make Gdańsk a free city to make both Poles and Germans satisfied
>"Waaaah, Polen steal our eternal port, we must invade it"
>Ww2, Germans get satisfied for a couple of years
>Allies decide the had enough kraut shit, give the port to Poland

>>2854778
>Allies (...) give the port to Poland
It was Stalin, no?

>>2854854
As you may know, Stalin had to switch teams in 1941, thus - suprise - USSR was part of the Allies

>>2854343
I know there is a difference. But I was just emphasizing on your "no malice" part.