>born 1896 >died 2011 Imagine having lived such a long

>>2845338
Ernst Junger too.
>Which 100 years do you think would have been most awful/good to live through?
Most awful: 1330-1430
Good: 1720-1820

>this man who was in his mid forties during WWII lived to see the iPhone
Made me think

>tfw born in 1996
>tfw have to live until 2111 to match him
wew lads I wonder what I'm in for I should already be three years into the equivalent of wwi

>>2845508
I think about that all the time. I wonder how things would be for a 100 years older version of me.

I think I'll be extremely disappointed of I live to be that old. I bet half the problems we have now still won't be fixed and people born in the 2050s will talk about how 2070 kids are worthless slobs

I recognised him immediately, Walter Breuning, good lad

years after 2020 don't seem real to me. like I can't imagine that time period existing, idk why

>>2845508
>I'm talking to people born in 1996
MAKE IT STOP PLEASE PLEASEEEE I DON'T WANT TO BE A RAISIN

>>2846610
There are far younger people than 20 on this board lad.

>>2846643
I'm 22 desu but it wasn't so long ago that I was just discovering this site, five years that I've wasted my life, reading your post I think that it feels worse that the 96 anon is 20 years old

There's this French woman who was like 40 at the start of WWI, met Van Gogh and died in 1997.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeanne_Calment

>>2846673
I'm 25 and I've been on this site for 12 years

Almost half my life

Between 1760 and 1860 in the US might have been neat.

>>2845396
>As a white person

File: 1378938362797.gif (3MB, 350x263px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 350x263px

>>2845338
Stop reminding me that the world won't end after i die

>>2847303
I'm asian

>>2847271
No, that's less than half of your life.

>>2847425
Epic fail

>>2845404
How about
>from first flight to landing in the Moon in less than 66 years