https://youtu.be/C9X44PSwc9s Why is it that atheists think that

The worst part is that his retarded fanbase will take his word for it and ignore his various prefaces about not being an expert.

That's my real problem with all these internet history "experts". With the exception of a few people like Matt Easton and Knyght Errant, the vast majority of them truly have no idea what they're talking about. And even when they're self aware enough to remind people that they're not professional historians, their fans just ignore that.

>>2838998
>I mean, I love Lindybeige, but when he starts talking about things he clearly doesn't and doesn't want to understand, he just makes me willing of bashing his head with a croquet mallet.
So then why do you love lindy? I have trouble thinking of a single video where he isn't talking about something he clearly doesn't understand and doesn't want to.

>>2838998
>listening for 35 minutes the ramblings of a madman
Can't you just post a tl;dr?

>>2839081
Hey you forgot he knows exactly what hes talking about. He does reanactments of them. That just like the real thing for sure.

>>2839081
I like most of his videos, really. Many of his most popular ones are packed with sources and data, he's just doing the divulging.

https://youtu.be/zViyZGmBhvs
https://youtu.be/P5x0Jlxl9uU
https://youtu.be/FDNyU1TQUXg
https://youtu.be/xcrxNBlqrbM
https://youtu.be/aofPdMbXzUQ

Or he's busting myths that are common in popular culture, and I learn new things since I'm not an historian

https://youtu.be/XtoBFXSvD6Y
https://youtu.be/8E6TzT0eCYs
https://youtu.be/5ds054OF7hY


Or he's just trying things on his person and giving honest feedback, what can you say to him?

https://youtu.be/yN8cYd3poIk
https://youtu.be/Vc9vrkZNNsQ

>>2839126
No one believes in god an nobody ever did.

>>2839210
This.
I miss his shorter points, though.
I can't blame him for giving in to much sponsors, but does it have to be 30 minutes every time?

>>2840870
I think that YouTube videos over a certain length get a lot more ad revenue

>>2838998
>Why is it that atheists think that religious illiteracy is a good starting point to discuss religion?

I don't know. I lean towards atheism and I feel embarrassed for people trying to argue when they can't even bother reading some scholarly literature on the topic if they don't feel like reading the source material.