Do you notice that nowadays people use the politically correct

The USSR under Stalin was a very different place to the USSR after Stalin.

Probably because they're referring to Stalinist regimes and not communist in general.

Oh, sorry, I meant "cuz le CULTURAL MARCISM REEEE XXXXDDDDD"

File: 2016.jpg (66KB, 450x600px)

66KB, 450x600px

>>2829395
>DUDE JUST LET THEE LEFTISTS TAKE OVER LMAO
kill yourself, SJW

>>2829318
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Its called stalinist like how one would refer to Periclean Athens or Napoleonic France, it has nothing to do with PC and muh cultural marxists.

>>2829414

He's right, though, I no defender of Gommunism (or political correctness for that matter) but it isn't appropriate to neuter the English language of all nuance just because you are butthurt about political correctness.

There is a difference between Stalinism and (for example) the policies of modern day China or the USSR under Krushchev or even Lenin.

>>2829318
it has nothing to do with political correctness, the USSR under Stalin was particularly totalitarian and more rigid in its control of small scale private enterprise or land ownership compared to before and after. There's nothing wrong with the distinction.

File: 69990.jpg (49KB, 350x401px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 350x401px

>>2829414

Probably because Stalinism refers to a specific mode of government. The USSR before Stalin was different, the USSR after Stalin was different, and basically every communist country after Stalin wound up abandoning his method of government (aside from North Korea and Albania).

are you mentally challenged? do you think all communist governments are identical to stalin's?

>>2829318
Stalinist as in authoritarian.

>>2829711
But Stalin was a totalitarian

>>2829695
antfia and the democrats worship Stalin

>>2829695
>North Korea

North Korea went on to officially abandon Communism. North Korea is Nazi-style national-socialist at this point, complete with racial purity policies.

>>2829796

Are you suggesting that the Democrats, the US political party worship Stalin, which is bizarre?

Or are you claiming that everyone that believes in democracy is a Stalinist, which is beyond insane?

>>2829318
Because the modern day liberal agenda is literally communist in the truest sense but they don't want the general public to conflate communism with the well documented horrors of Stalin so it's a form of deception on their end.

File: oh boy.jpg (45KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 500x375px

>>2829796
>democrats worship Stalin

>>2829395
>leftists are this mad

Stalinism is a subsect of communism. E.g Mao was a Stalinist but Castro or Tito were not. It's a sect like idk Trotskyists, left communism, Marxism leninism, anarcho communism etc

>>2829796

[citation needed]

>>2830038

Mao is a Maoist.

Stalinist has a focus on industry, and removes opponents by secret police/official purges.

Mao focused on the peasantry, and removes opponents by public denouncements and demagoguery.

Cult of personality is shared.

can /pol/ stop making everything about American politics? It's always "leftist this leftist that" when our ideologies in the US are both moderate liberal capitalists; there are no extremes here and what you consider "left" in the US would be considered "right" in an actual left country. Furthermore what Democrats consider "right wing" is actually just slightly right leaning moderate.

Now that you understand all that, please stop shoving literally the entirety of history through your tiny lense of American ideology that only sees the middle of a vast spectrum. You look so fucking stupid saying "leftist" on a history board when talking about classical liberals, this isn't /pol/ and your vocabulary is shit

File: little red academia.png (432KB, 750x350px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 750x350px

All Maoists are Stalinists but not all Stalinists are Maoists.

All Stalinists are Leninists but not all Leninists are Stalinists.

All Leninists are Marxists but not all Marxists are Leninists.

All Marxists are socialists but not all socialists are Marxists.

>>2830158
ideologies are not squares and rectangles.

STEM pls go

>>2830205
>All monkeys are mammals but not all mammals are monkeys

File: AreYouJoking.jpg (58KB, 500x535px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x535px

>>2829796

File: pure master race.jpg (117KB, 1019x675px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1019x675px

>>2829414
Fight on, keyboard warrior

"Stalinist" isn't a politically correct term. It was coined by Stalin's own disciples (Lazar Kaganovich) in the 1930s as a way to overblow Stalin's contributions to the formation of the USSR

Stalinism itself is used to refer to a system of communist government and allegiance, mainly to differentiate it from conventional marxist-leninism (Post-Stalin USSR/Warsaw Pact, Vietnam, Cuba, etc.) Titoism (Yugoslavia), and Maoist (China, Albania, Cambodia). North Korea's Juche is yet another different type of communist regime, though all 4 can be called marxist and all 4 are interrelated (i.e. Mao was a stalinist until the Sino-Soviet split).

Stalinism itself was strict totalitarian control, a vast police state, and a cult of personality around a central leader with a blend of nationalism, militarism, and emphasis on industrialization. Maosim is extremely similar but with an emphasis on rural/peasantry as the focus of the revolution and treating urban-dwellers and everything associated with it as bourgeoisie on top of extreme isolationism. In truth both movements can only be differentiated if they were allied to Moscow to Beijing (i.e. Barre's Somalia was probably more maoist, yet was allied with the USSR for a time)

Thus it has nothing to do with political correctness, it has to do with system of governance in the post-Khrushchev era and later on who was allied to who in the Sino-Soviet split.

But of course you're just a /pol/beard looking to get a certain narrative so I'm wasting my time.

>>2830158
this is also true

File: image.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>2829796

>>2829672
>if you aren't a commie, you must be a nazi!
t. leftpol

>le politically correct ebil SJW's meme

kys retards

>>2830057
This.

>>2829796
THEY SURE DO WHITE POWER AMMIRITE?

>>2830246
Who is this with the prussian(?) flag and why do I keep seeing him?

Left-weiners in despair

>>2829459
Yet fascism is used as a catchall

>>2829318
But it fits
>vanguard states
>slightly pass state capitalism
>heavy national focus
They all waited for the communist revolution but they were never liberated as British and France never turned

>>2833814
Because plebs are retarded
True academics know there's an ocean of difference between Italian fascism and Nazism