>Baby Jesus is visited from wise men from the east
>they followed a star to find him
>His childhood isn't recorded
>suddenly he appears in Middle east preaching radical stuff similar to buddhism
>atheist scholars accept he was a real person but never critically examine the resurrection and will call the idea of him surviving the cross ridiculous, despite accepting other parts of the gospels as a source.
>Goes back to the East
>he even has a tomb there
>people still refuse outright to even entertain this idea.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY0Ib3aPG6Y
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roza_Bal
>>2811860
"Jesus was a rabbi" t.jews
"Jesus was a buddhist monk" t.buddhist
"Jesus was a prophet but not ours" t.muslims
>>2811860
>he even has a tomb there
Christ is Risen.
This shows everything as wrong in your theory.
>>2811860
>suddenly he appears in Middle east preaching radical stuff similar to buddhism
Granted, I have only a casual knowledge of Buddhism, but I'm pretty sure they don't preach a belief that the world is going to end imminently and one must repent and purify yourself before that happens.
>>2811860
>>he even has a tomb there
A tomb that wasn't mentioned until the 18th century and that most locals don't even take seriously.
>>2811860
>atheist scholars accept he was a real person
>atheist scholars accept he was a real person
>>2811860
The wise men were Zoroastrian priests.
>>2811902
none of those contradict when you take yourself out of the modern western notion of religion as being this monolithic organisations that you have to support like a football team
>>2811973
The world is always ending. YOUR world could end the next time you walk out your front door and get hit by a car. Death is always imminent one should live one's life accordingly. Death, and the rebirth is always an instant away.
>>2812344
That has absolutely nothing to do with early Christian apocalyptic teachings. Please read 1 Thesslonians; where the death of a congregationist before the world ceased to exist was a major theological crisis.
>>2812046
>>2812049
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus#Testimonium_Flavianum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Christ
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2014/09/04/an-atheists-defense-of-the-historicity-of-jesus/
>"He certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees"
- Bart Ehrman
>"There are those who argue that Jesus is a figment of the Church’s imagination, that there never was a Jesus at all. I have to say that I do not know any respectable critical scholar who says that any more.
- Michael Grant
>"In recent years, 'no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non historicity of Jesus' or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary.
- Richard Burridge
>>2811860
>resurrects from the dead so he could walk back to India and die there
What?