If we were to divide the map by (dominant) ethnicity in the region,

If US is a hodgepodge, so are Australia, NZ, Canada, Russia, North Africa and the western half of Europe.

>>2808461
You can see that the artist forgot Ireland existed.

>>2808470
US is 56 white.France the country that (has more non Europeans in Europe) is 90% white.Amerilards are deluded

>>2808461
Make India blue.

>>2808461
>have Eurasia but cut it in half
>Chinese and native Americans are the same

>>2808471
I̶ ̶a̶m̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶a̶u̶t̶h̶o̶r̶ ̶

>>2808485
Should I? I was never quite sure about what the origin of Hindus is exactly.

>>2808495
I based that choice in the alaskan bridge theory.

File: map by ethnicity2.png (44KB, 1357x768px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 1357x768px

>>2808495
Like this?

It is my understanding that Afghanistan doesn't have much asian in it.

>>2808461
The eastern half of the US should be yellow and blue, and the western half should be orange and blue.

Also Latin America has a ton of African diaspora, they imported the most African labor in the entirety of the new world.

File: map by ethnicity2.png (44KB, 1357x768px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 1357x768px

>>2808519
And now that I think about it Alaska should also be spitted 50/50 with native Americans. Tho I'm not sure about that one.

>>2808531
>Also Latin America has a ton of African diaspora
It varies a lot from country to country.

>>2808531
>>2808541
Brasil has a lot of Africans, in every other country in LA it is <15%.

Except for Cuba, which has nearly 30%. .

>>2808531
I'd like for some other people to confirm the Eastern US vs Western US thing, since I always tough it was just a meme.

>>2808470
The average White in America is still 98.6% European. Plus "Hispanic" includes literal full Iberian blooded Spaniards and Portuguese.

>>2808552
No, it is just very unpopular in LA to identify as black.

>>2808567
But it's also very common to group Amerindians and mestizos with blacks. Which is not accurate.

And either way I would like to believe that the people carrying out the census would take this into account.

>>2808567
Come on, anon. I don't people to start memeing about >argentina >white, but I'm from buenos aires the first time I saw a black person I was like 8 in an airport.

>>2808519
Afghanistan is one of the most mixed socities on Earth. You can have black (african) looking afghans, indian looking ones, white looking ones and even asian looking ones.

They should be their own colour.

>>2808589
black =/= non white
I'm British, I should know.

>>2808590
Is there no "dominant" group per say?

Also what about Pakistan? Might as well ask since we're in the topic.

>>2808532
All the Pacific Islands should be orange.

>>2808608
>I'm British
Opinion disregarded.

>>2808578
Even black people in Latin America don't identify as black, this is well known.

>>2808620
They identify as black or African.

>>2808619
It's not an opinion you retard.
Pakis aren't white but but they aren't african blacks either.

>>2808532
Siberia should be orange. It's still mostly Asians living there despite the Russian rule.

>>2808608
I know but any mention of argentina in the context of a race discussion triggers the meme in my experience.

>>2808623
No they don't. They identify as pardo or whatever.

>>2808646
>pardo
That's triracial people.

>>2808614
>Also what about Pakistan? Might as well ask since we're in the topic.
A mix between Northerner Indians and Pashtun's I think.

>>2808626
>Pakis aren't white but but they aren't african blacks either.
Australoid?

>>2808656
Black Americans are also largely multi-racial, yet still identify as black.

>>2808663
Yes, or something to that effect.
Though I'm sure the preference would be Indo-Aryan.

>>2808670
That's because of the one-drop rule.

File: !-,.%22'-#¿[}-`%÷--&¦™.jpg (8KB, 250x201px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x201px

>>2808629
I'm not sure, I don't have any other places to read on the topic at the moment but wikimemedia says the majority of the population is slavic.

Which admittedly should in itself be considered 50/50?

I'm not sure about it still.

>>2808663
Middle east is closer to Europeans, from what I understand in fact they're the precursors to "modern" Europeans.

But now that you mention Australoid, isn't there a region of Africa inhabited by this group? And isn't this group considered a 4th major group separated from the other 3?

>>2808693
>But now that you mention Australoid, isn't there a region of Africa inhabited by this group?
Madagascar

>>2808684
So a rule only enforced in a minority of states which hasn't been enforced anywhere since the 1960s?

>>2808620
>>2808623
>>2808646
>>2808656
>>2808670
>>2808684
>>2808701
Regardless of how they identify, I think we can all agree that having 1 far off ancestor of X group and actually qualifying as being part of X group are not one and the same.
Blacks in the US are maybe a bit too distanced from Africans, and maybe it isn't fair to group them together at this point, but within all the established groups they fit the African description the best.

In Latin America it is common for amerindians and mestizos to be grouped with blacks just due to their dark skin tone, and it is truth that some blacks don't like identifying as blacks themselves, but that shouldn't be reflected in demographic statistics.

File: image.jpg (3MB, 2400x3000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2400x3000px

>>2808724
It shouldn't be reflected in demographic data, but it is. Roberto Clemente thought he was a spaniard. Sad.

File: south-indian-man-standing-his-arms-crossed-smiling-portrait-36256143.jpg (76KB, 955x1300px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 955x1300px

>>2808672
>Though I'm sure the preference would be Indo-Aryan.
Yeah.
From some quick googling online, it seems 'Indo-Aryans' tend to have more 'chiseled', longer features while Australoid Indians tend to have smaller/rounder faces, more oily skin and a much higher chance of having nappy hair.

Pic related, one of the first pics I found on google images.

>>2808693
>But now that you mention Australoid, isn't there a region of Africa inhabited by this group? And isn't this group considered a 4th major group separated from the other 3?
You mean Australian Aboriginals?

>>2808724
>Blacks in the US are maybe a bit too distanced from Africans, and maybe it isn't fair to group them together at this point, but within all the established groups they fit the African description the best.
If the average Black is 75% African, 25% other with two Black parents I see no issue in classifying them as African.

File: map by ethnicity4.png (46KB, 1357x768px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1357x768px

Looking better?


>>2808741
Should we consider Pygmy and Australoids part of the same group?

>>2808749
Those numbers include actual African Americans(African immigrants) so skew the percentages for black Americans a bit.

>>2808758
Actually disregard the question about pygmy and Australoid. I wasn't thinking when I wrote it.

>>2808758
>Should we consider Pygmy and Australoids part of the same group?
I guess so?

>>2808787
>>2808773
Yeah haha. I never heard about Pygmies descending from early India so I was surprised.

I've never seen anything more autistic

>>2808761
We don't have too many African immigrants here. 2.1 million (and that includes all of Africa, not just Black sub-Sahara) so they don't skew data THAT much. Genetic testers can't even decide how much European DNA the average African has. Some people have it as low as 19%, making the 25% too high.

>>2808787
>>2808791
I got confused for a moment.

>>2808795
What about a mirror?

>>2808796
Non-black Africans identify as white.

>3 race theory
idiots, read Livingstone

>>2809104
That pops out a lot of results in Google friend.

>>2808461
>ethnicity

You mean race

And MENA are mulattoes

>>2808481
>90%
85-86% actually

>>2808481
*63%
And that's excluding hispanic whites
Also, even if you did have your statistics right, that still means that there's more white Americans than Frenchmen in the world.

>>2809198

Pretty easy since "White American" are just an "ethnicty" made from every Europeans

>>2809186
Are they really? I'd think their skin colour is more due to the climate rather than because of race.

>>2809186
>And MENA are mulattoes

In what way are we mulatto?

>>2809225
Well if you wanna be specific about it, you can say "European Americans" and it would fill the same role.

File: image.jpg (41KB, 500x331px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x331px

>>2809241
The black admixture senpai.

File: cholos[1].jpg (42KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x375px

>>2809198
>hispanic whites
Oh yeah counting mestizos as white makes America less diverse (kek).
In 30 years pic will be the average amerimud white

>>2808562
The iberians don't need to emigrate to the US of A. Only mestizos,mulattos and Cubans (which are the only white hispanics in America) emigrate to that shithole

File: z.png (41KB, 1357x628px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 1357x628px

If you want to divide the world by ethnicity you'll probably get something like this. Europeans, Mediterreneans, Mongoloids, Asiatics, Bantu and Eskimo peoples are a majority in these approximate areas.

>>2809269
>Cubans are white

>>2808693
The majority of the population is slavic because no one lives in the eastern area of russia

>>2809254
That might be true for NA Arabs, but as a Levantine Arab, I find it hard to believe that I have significant African admixture.

>>2809270
That's pretty good, I'll save it for future reference desu

>>2809262
Bro chill, including the hispanics only adds another 9% to the white total to bring it up to 72%.
Gonna be hard to mix the whole country when they only make up 16% of it, there's only slightly more of them than there are blacks.

>>2809177
http://encyclopedia.jrank.org/articles/pages/6075/Clines-and-Continuous-Variation.html

>>2808505
Indo-European

There are five major groups of people in the world

>Whites
>Blacks
>Arabs
>Indians
>Asians
>Native Americans

All others are just a mix of those. Sami? Mix of white and asian. Indonesians? Mix of asian and indian. Greeks? Mix of white and arab.

>>2809270
What have Indians,Japanese and Gulf Arabs in common?

>>2809601
Indo-europeans expanded from the middle east and a lot of european culture has it's roots in the middle east and North Africa.

Native Americans didn't likely separate from asians long enough to be considerably different biologically speaking. A lot of people have also pointed out how Hindus are indo-european as well.

>>2809601
what about Jews?

Or Irish, Poles and Italians, who were not considered white until the 1910s?