How does /his/ feel about women as rewards. You know, like if

>>2797442
I agree anon. Consent is good, and rape is bad. I'm glad we made this thread.

>>2797442
I disagree anon. The might of the conqueror is good, consent does not matter and is bad. I'm glad we made this thread.

I am ambivalent. Consent should be given but the conqueror could provide more for those he claims. I am glad we made this thread.

>>2797442
Well obviously, it's ok if the women consent and not ok if they don't.

How you can consent to war rape is beyond me

>>2797442
Women are mentally children throughout their lives, so their consent is irrelevant. Important is however what her family wishes to happen, and two people deciding to have a duel for a woman is meaningless if her family disapproves of both of them.

>>2797442

It really doesn't matter, since women will always end up siding with the victor, regardless of origin.

Lucky cunts

Imagine losing a war and the enemy giving you orgasms as punishment

>>2798329

but what if you had to fuck a fat, short, hairy, smelly new york jew-looking motherfucker?

think of yourself, personally, would you be happy taking just any dick?

>>2800390
>>2800390
It wouldn't just be the dick of some random slob. It would be the dick of warrior who just showed his martial prowess over you tribe/nation/culture. I highly doubt that short and fat jews would be conquering anyone.

roasties love to be fought for and conquered it gives them tinglies

File: 14711426716980.jpg (70KB, 668x400px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 668x400px

>>2800390

Bridal kidnapping is LITERALLY the only mode of reproduction that makes any sense

File: 1439121564842.jpg (47KB, 364x336px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 364x336px

>>2797503
>>2797539
>>2797544
>>2797921
>>2800390
holy fuck, when did we become flooded with r*ddit?

If you're a war with a people and you're both pre modern you have no moral obligation whatsoever to them.
Moral obligation comes from group membership