>Atheists claim to be rational
>Almost all arguments for atheism are based on emotional appeals
>Æutists spend their only life shitposting on an imageboard
The tiny minority of arguments aren't almost all, anon.
>>2797285
Talk to your average atheist, nine times out of ten it's either "I don't believe because my parents were mean" or "I don't believe because God doesn't make my life easier".
>>2797338
Talk to your average theist, nine times out of ten it's either "I believe because my parents were mean" or "I believe because God makes my life easier".
>>2797338
> I don't believe because God doesn't make my life easier
This is the pragmatic argument, not an emotional one. What is a point of believing in something if it just makes things harder?
>>2797359
regardless it doesn't determine the truth of that belief, which is the issue with emotional arguments
>>2797262
have you considered reading The Early History of God by Mark S. Smith?
>>2797262
Rebut Rowe's inductive argument from evil right now
>>2797262
It does not matter what the majority of people say the rational argument will still be the rational argument. But neither strict theism or atheism is rational because they deal with unknowable things. However, many religions make claims that can falsified or proven to be mistaken which makes them somewhat less rational.
>>2797262
>tfw the concept of god seems to be an imaginary thing invented by early man to quench his fears, but science still doesn't know how the universe came to be or if we are running in a simulation, so apathetic agnosticism is the only logical position
>>2797436
>science doesn't know how universe came to be
lolwut
>>2797436
>apathetic agnosticism
>>2797345
>my parents were mean to me
>so I'll be the same faith as them
Really made me think anon
>>2797359
Because then you have a good life once your body dies
>>2797262
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c-Cf6O0ogI
this is pretty much it
nothing like a tasty does of hipocracy
>>2797476
> you have a good life
More like a simulation of your mind could suffer less after you would be dead.
>>2797262
I don't believe in an entity that would have create earth or men intentionally and that would be monitoring us. I keep the doubt in mind, because thats what any reasonable people do. What we know for sure is that we knows today more about the world than any religion or any community in recent history. To believe is OK if it does help you in life to get through hard moment. To let religious people still praticing preach in 2017 is just a step backward in evolution.
>>2797444
Our knowledge can only go so far back we can't say anything really insightfu about the primordial existence that existed prior to the big bang.