Why there is a debate about beauty and moral being subjective,

>>2797159
Well while I think you are right that trurh is something subjective. It is one of those things where it becomes a dead end and nothing can move forward unless we all agree on some ground rules. Truth being at least somewhat objective is one of them.

If morality wasn't objective, then somebody could provide an example of at least one situation where two logical actors have mutually exclusive interests.

The objective truth is that beauty is subjective

It's half societal standards, half evolution.

We naturally find people who have blatant body deformities to be unattractive,for we know they could make unideal kids. Woman naturally prefer taller, stronger men. And men naturally prefer more youthful, healthy women.

There are societal standards, however, which alter what people find attractive. Such as fashion

>>2797159
You can make an objective statement about someone's subjective preference.

It is an objective fact that Kanye West has a subjective taste for hip hop.

>>2797159
>in some culture

fucking name one

>>2797159
>... the woman of your dreams is seen as just the same as everyone else.
WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT EVEN MEAN

>>2799601
I think this is what they're trying to say,

The love of your life, to you, has distinct features unique to them that make them one of a kind in your eyes. To a foreigner, however, they're just another (American/Brit/German/Insert Nationality Here).

>>2799610
Wouldn't a foreigner see them in a more unique way than the people of her own nationality where she is one of many? Kind of like when people from other countries, visit said countries and can form more objective views vs people who live there. Or when you leave your country and see it from a distance you can finally see it in a more objective way. Like I didn't know how shitty American standards were until I travelled to Japan and Western Europe. Even Costa Rica was better.