Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: IMG_7756.jpg (30KB, 316x465px) Image search:
[Google]
30KB, 316x465px
>In 1991, the Americans destroyed half the infrastructure in his country, and terrorists seized control of two thirds of the country in the aftermath
>he retook all the country from terrorists within one month and rebuilt the infrastructure the Americans had destroyed within 6 months despite the American-British-U.N. sanctions
>current Iraqi government can't defeat Isis and the country is a mess despite massive US support
Someone explain. How did he do it? What went right?
>>
He ruled Iraq with an iron fist. Democracy is a meme.
>>
>>2785020
>Baathist government that wants a strong Iraq vs. satrapy that wants to line its pockets and appease its foreign overlord
>>
>>2785020
>despite massive US support
The thing is the massive US support is for ISIS.
>>
>>2785020
Honestly, Saddam is the only /pol/ approved dictator that i find to have been an actually great leader, he did great asides from edgy memery.
>>
>>2785240
Franco was also bretty gud, he actually did good unlike that bumfuck retard Mussolini
>>
>>2785020
>US Support
US is supporting ISIS here pal, Iraq is no longer under their control, it's government is too infiltrated by Iranians.
>>
>>2785244
Well Franco did a great economic management but i think he went a little bit authoritarian onto killing 200.000 people, plus the idea that he could restore Monarchy after his death was very silly.
Also, i think Gaddafi was also a great Middle East dictator. Arab socialism in general seemed to have worked out well.
>>
>>2785020
>What went right?
Oil.
>>
>>2785264
Franco had to kill them, they were at war, they weren't peaceful hipsters but dangerous socialists linked to russians
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1