Why did indians tribes fight each others if they had no concept

Why do urban gangs fight over turf if neither of them owns the deed to the property?

>>2783223
that's pretty much the same thing, it doesn't answer my question

>>2783211
for women ofc, hunters need pussy constantly

They had ethnic/tribal conceptions of territory/property. People who are your in-group, i.e more genetically related to you, control a piece of land. Some other distantly related ethnic group of your own race, but with enough genetic difference relative to your own kin, come and want to take it. You fight a war over whose extended family gets the rights to that land and its produce.

>>2783211
they still recognized that the territory gave them access to resources they needed and could acquire there with less effort than moving to find others.

also, because the comanche are fucking THIEVES and outsiders must die if they fuck with our horses

one of those

>>2783211
>had no concept of territorial property?
Who actually says this? One of the most ignorant things I've read, next to the noble savage meme.

>>2783319
this is what americans says to justify their theft of the indian land

>>2783340
this is funny because it was originally thrown around as a way of elevating their "more natural" culture and "connection to the land"

>>2783211
Because the wanted to continue having power, if you don't expand, your power will deflate

>>2783223
fpbp

>>2783319
Pretty much every Communist, progressive, liberal, and socialist ever.

>>2783211
Owning land isn't the same as owning hunting areas

>>2783234

natives have some of the smallest average erect penis sizes. Would native women even enjoy sex?

>>2783575
Who cares?

>>2783575
yeah but they use them with atl-atls so it greatly extends their ejaculation range

the wichita culture was known to cum over 50m at a time

>>2783575
that must be your nigger tribe, in the andes men have yuge dicks

>>2783628
Kek

>>2783498
>Pretty much every Communist, progressive, liberal, and socialist ever.
But I only ever see it brought up by conservatives using it as a strawman of how liberals believe it.

>>2785197
If liberals don't actually believe it, then why do they moan so much about how evil it was that the white man treated the red savages the same way the red savages treated everyone else?

File: The Scythians 700-300BC-24.jpg (328KB, 1200x1657px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1200x1657px

>>2783211
I dunno, OP, why did Steppeniggers fight each other if they had no concept of territorial property?

>>2783340
Manifest Destiny, bitches.

File: 1493078242048.jpg (47KB, 418x582px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 418x582px

>>2785236
1. Indians having a sense of property has very little to do with the morality of the federal and state governments deliberate attempts at genocide.
>Well I thought putting a bounty on dead Indian children scalps was evil but then I found out that they had mortgages! Of course I Dr.Evilliberal the Checker of Privilege Esq. only believed that the genocide of natives only mattered because of their precious lack of property concepts!
2. "The Red Man" is not a monolithic entity. Not all tribes are the same some were shitty some were chill some were in between. Lumping thousands of ethnicity's together as one entity reeks of bias.
3. Referring to them all as savages indiscriminately, is also bias.
4. Just because someone is shitty doesn't give you license to act shitty too especially if they haven't done anything to you as was the case with most tribes.
5. Because the US government never stopped being shitty to them. So even if they were savages, it doesn't justify being a dick to their descendants who just want to mind their own business. inb4 white privilege straw-man.

Most of them were the fragments of the Mississippi Mound Builders.

The Europeans showed up in the wake of a civilizational collapse.

It'd be like if Aliens invaded during the fall of Rome

>>2783211

Because like all humans, they were hypocrites.

>>2785338
>1. Indians having a sense of property has very little to do with the morality of the federal and state governments deliberate attempts at genocide.
Sure it does.

>2. "The Red Man" is not a monolithic entity. Not all tribes are the same some were shitty some were chill some were in between
The weak ones were "chill" because they couldn't compete with the strong ones.
> Lumping thousands of ethnicity's together as one entity reeks of bias.
lol

>3. Referring to them all as savages indiscriminately, is also bias.
lol

>4. Just because someone is shitty doesn't give you license to act shitty too especially if they haven't done anything to you as was the case with most tribes.
Wrong.

>5. Because the US government never stopped being shitty to them. So even if they were savages, it doesn't justify being a dick to their descendants who just want to mind their own business.
Fuck em. It's high time they left the rez and joined civilization any way. Play times over sweetie, time to get a job.

>>2785537
Can you elaborate beyond lol and wrong for your answers?

>>2783575
only western men care about women enjoying sex

File: the search for Chief Falling Rocks continues to this day.jpg (23KB, 304x274px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 304x274px

>>2783211
Why do nomads go to war?

Perception of slight, leading to a war, leading to blood crying out for blood, leading to generational war, rinse, repeat.

War isn't always about territory or resources. Quite often it's about justice, or culture, or simply "We don't like those guys". (See also the Hatfields vs. McCoys)

Not that they didn't sometimes have wars over actual territory and resources as well, but nomads everywhere have ended up fighting each other throughout history, often with no territory or resources being involved.

...and even stranger, tribal raids - not so much in North American Indian cultures, but among other primitive tribes - rarely involved taking territory at all. The enemy tribe would come in, kill a few people, kidnap a few women, and everyone would go right back home, and this "war game" would go on back and forth for generations, with neither tribe ever actually taking the other's home from them.

Humans are temperamental creatures.

>>2785811
I find the attempts at avoiding bias laughable and the idea that you need a license to be shitty is just plain wrong.

>>2783575
An ethnicity that has men with smaller than average penises will also have woman with smaller than average vaginas you ape.