Why did wikipedia remove photos representative of ethnicities on their pages about ethnicities? Was it SJWs?
>>2776676
yes it was SJWs and it's all because of the jews. you can go home now.
>>2776683
Oh thank god
>>2776676
There's a picture of blonde guy in "blonde hair" article
I actually watched it happen. It was quite amusing.
It was all because someone insisted on putting a Somali immigrant in the "Swedish people" infobox and they simply wouldn't accept that it wasn't appropriate because the infobox was supposed to show ethnic Swedes. They kept arguing that there was no such thing as ethnic Swedes and this went on and on until the admins decided it would be better just to get rid of the infoboxes entirely.
>>2776676
'Typical' members of ethnicities are a meme. Think of how many different skin tones fall under African American, and how many people have a mixed ethnic background.
>>2776728
kek, sounds like a /pol/ deep cover operation
>>2776745
Yeah, but probably isn't. Just your typical Swedish politically correct insanity.
>>2776739
>it's another outliers and variation exist therefore averages do not episode
>>2776756
>memes.com watermark
Kill yourself.
>>2776797
>Kill yourself.
>>>/r/eddit
>>2776817
Look at him being so new that he thinks that "kys" is the original form.
Seriously, kill yourself.
>>2776820
What the fuck is your problem? His image has memes.com on it and you get THIS triggered? Brainlet detected holy shit
>>2776820
Seriously,
>>>/r/eddit
>>2776728
link to the discussion page or it didn't happen
>>2776756
back to 9gag with you faggot
>>2776676
You know why son.
>>2776797
>>2776837
>These faggots can't refute so they hone in on a watermark
Please stop mucking up this board with your lefty desperation.
Don't you know? Merely admitting phenotypical variation exists is a fascist construct! Celebrate diversity, but don't actually notice it!
>>2776862
If you use a site called memes.com you deserve to be fucking shot
>>2776745
it's hardly a deep cover operation if they are repeating your words back at you
Where do you think this >>2776739 argument goes for example. Unlike you, there are people who follow their arguments to their logical conclusion, they stop because they think it would lead to an embarrasing conclusion
>>2776875
>watermark necessarily means he saved it from said website
are you autistic?
>>2776977
>doesn't even have the common courtesy to edit out the watermark to avoid situations like these
Brought it on himself desu.
>>2777012
You couldn't have answered my question better.
>>2777055
>where do you think we are.jpeg
Judging from the compression artifacts in that pic you probably saved that from some meme aggregator as well you fucking shitebag.
>>2777061
you caught me bub.
Why do redditors derail threads they don't like? It's pathetic.
>>2776749
Go read the fucking interview you stupid piece of shit. She didn't went back because of political correctness idiot
>>2776676
you can read about the ruling here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Images/Archive_6
there was an SJW who kept editing the Swedes page, but the ruling seems more about the difficulty in choosing representatives than identity politics