Is your historical knowledge vast enough to tie multiple centers of civilization together?
Most here are probably knowledgeable about European cultures, Europeans had most contact with Arabic culture. Are you able to link both cultures's history together fluently?
What about Arab's history with African's history? Or Arab with India. Or Europe with central asian steppe tribes. Or the Steppe tribes with Arabs or Chinese? Or the Indians with SEA and the SEA with China?
How close are you to unifying your historical knowledge into a global history?
>>2755588
Eat my dick faggot.
I can link cultures together through the silk road and know China and Rome traded with each other. I know Hellenism greatly shaped the Middle East and North India.
>>2755588
Pretty far dude. I only know European and history (except the eraly middle ages) and maybe a little bit Arabian/North African. I would love to learn a bit more about Persia or India but I can't find a good way online
>>2755588
I can, but to be honest, most of the regions were more or less isolated most of the time. I.e. you can learn about the European History without having any knowledge of Africa or even the Middle East at the time, and vice versa. Global history starts in the 16th century.
>>2755588
I know what you mean OP. When you get really deep into history all the little connections and butterflies become innumerable.
>>2756889
You can't really have most regions be isolated.
All regions have neighbors with exception being the Americas. Even then, Americas have their own history which is bit unrecorded and fuzzy right now. And the neighbors have other neighbors and so on.
The Xiongnu for example pushed the Yeuzhi westward and Yeuzhi pushed into Bactria to become Kushans, who pushed the Parthians. Parthians were pushing Romans, etc
The empire, the country's policies are inevitably linked towards one another.