Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: Stalin_1945.jpg (158KB, 424x568px) Image search:
[Google]
158KB, 424x568px
> When /his/' amoralism completes your understanding of Joseph Stalin as the greatest leader of the 20th century
> When said amoralism leads you to absolve all kinds of dictators and strongmen, from Enver "Genocide? What Genocide" Pasha, Vlad "Put Skewer in Kebab" Tepes, Adolf "Did nothing wrong" Hitler and even Augusto "Dog Rape" Pinochet of their sins.
> tfw when you know view history through a lens completely devoid of morality, as nothing more as a contest of conflicting interests and that all morality inserted into it is an illusion, lulling you into a macabre calm for the rest of your life.
Tell me /his/, is any element of morality desirable in history? Or is this beautiful void the apex of understanding it?
>>
The weak must fear the strong.
>>
>>2739536
I disagree, anyone with a moral bone in their body realizes that Jews and communists are not human.
Stalin was shit tho.
>>
>>2739549
Jews are superhuman. I wish I were jewish.
They're Intelligent as fuck.
>>
>>2739558
Too bad all their intelligence is diverted into cultural subversion and usury :/
>>
>>2739536
There are basically 3 possibilities, OP:
1) you are a sociopath
2) you are larping as a sociopath
3) you are a kid and have no understanding of what violence is actually like
>>
I don't mind moralism in history, but I insist on consistency. None of this, "We can't judge X by modern standards" bullshit.
Is it justified to kill innocents to strengthen the state? If no, then Peter the Great was a monster. If yes, he stands in Stalin's shadow.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1