Everything you see in the world of extended space is your body's

>>2734464
>Everything you see in the world of extended space is your body's response to a minor tingle on the inner surfaces of your eyes.
Wrong. Hallucinations are the product of the brain not the eye.

File: immateriumman.png (41KB, 120x144px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 120x144px

>implying there is anything outside of perception
>implying material things exist
>implying its not just ideas in the minds of perceivers

File: IMG_0403.jpg (16KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 225x225px

>>2734473

Missing the larger point, focusing on exceptions that are rare, and that I'd bet are parasitic on original visual data gathered through normal functioning.

File: image.jpg (193KB, 635x630px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 635x630px

>>2734477

> implying idealism is incompatible with the empirical realism of the physical world

File: 1479097282956.jpg (153KB, 1072x650px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1072x650px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW8iTTV_fAU
>a cockatoo can figure this out but continental "philosophers" can't
You don't have complete control over the external world therefore it is not part of you.

There is evidence to suggest you are a fleshbag like the other humans you observe but no evidence you are a brain in a jar.

>>2736231

> you don't have complete control over your bodily actions or your train of thought so your self is not part of you

>>2736246
If I chopped your finger off would you die? In fact you can have parts of your brain dissected and still be a conscious functioning human being. Clearly "you" in the physical world is a slither of grey matter in the neo-cortex, tops.

File: IMG_1173.jpg (223KB, 461x567px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 461x567px

>>2736246
>>2736280
>You

>>2734473
kek

>>2734464
Because that kind of introspection is evolutionary disadvantageous. The less you're aware of the arbitrary nature of your "self" and your experience if reality the better for your mental health.

File: 1453663256954.jpg (220KB, 1466x1050px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 1466x1050px

Really makes me think.

>>2734464
I am actually failing to see the point.